TSTP Solution File: HWV099+1 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : HWV099+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:18:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 235.18s 229.41s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : HWV099+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 19 03:29:36 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 25.81/25.04 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 25.81/25.04 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 25.81/25.04 Peak sizes were: global stack 124696 kbytes, trail stack 6376 kbytes
% 51.43/49.87 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 51.43/49.87 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 51.43/49.87 Peak sizes were: global stack 124696 kbytes, trail stack 6376 kbytes
% 77.23/74.95 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 77.23/74.95 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 77.23/74.95 Peak sizes were: global stack 124696 kbytes, trail stack 6376 kbytes
% 94.99/92.09 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.99/92.09 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.99/92.09 Peak sizes were: global stack 126104 kbytes, trail stack 5096 kbytes
% 119.40/116.18 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 119.40/116.18 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 119.40/116.18 Peak sizes were: global stack 124696 kbytes, trail stack 6376 kbytes
% 142.35/138.57 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 142.35/138.57 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 142.35/138.57 Peak sizes were: global stack 124696 kbytes, trail stack 6504 kbytes
% 169.69/165.49 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 169.69/165.49 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 169.69/165.49 Peak sizes were: global stack 126104 kbytes, trail stack 5096 kbytes
% 235.15/229.10 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 235.15/229.10 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 235.15/229.10 Peak sizes were: global stack 124696 kbytes, trail stack 6376 kbytes
% 235.18/229.41 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------