TSTP Solution File: HWV052-1.001.001 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : HWV052-1.001.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:42:42 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.11s 1.89s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  18 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  44 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (   8   ~;  15   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   3   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (;  27   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ unpack1 > #nlpp > pack1 > inv > o > i

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(i,type,
    i: $i ).

tff(unpack1,type,
    unpack1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(inv,type,
    inv: $i > $i ).

tff(pack1,type,
    pack1: $i > $i ).

tff(o,type,
    o: $i ).

tff(f_31,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( inv(X) != X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( X = o )
      | ( X = i ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_35,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ( unpack1(inv(X1),pack1(X1)) = X1 ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ( unpack1(X1,pack1(X1)) = X1 ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ( unpack1(X1,inv(pack1(X1))) = X1 ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_2] : ( inv(X_2) != X_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] :
      ( ( i = X_1 )
      | ( o = X_1 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    ! [X1_42] : ( unpack1(inv(X1_42),pack1(X1_42)) = X1_42 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_252,plain,
    ! [X1_92] :
      ( ( unpack1(inv(X1_92),o) = X1_92 )
      | ( pack1(X1_92) = i ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_48]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [X1_37] : ( unpack1(X1_37,pack1(X1_37)) = X1_37 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_41,plain,
    ! [X1_37] :
      ( ( unpack1(X1_37,o) = X1_37 )
      | ( pack1(X1_37) = i ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_32]) ).

tff(c_261,plain,
    ! [X1_92] :
      ( ( inv(X1_92) = X1_92 )
      | ( pack1(inv(X1_92)) = i )
      | ( pack1(X1_92) = i ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_252,c_41]) ).

tff(c_288,plain,
    ! [X1_92] :
      ( ( pack1(inv(X1_92)) = i )
      | ( pack1(X1_92) = i ) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_261]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ! [X1_57] : ( unpack1(X1_57,inv(pack1(X1_57))) = X1_57 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_192,plain,
    ! [X1_82] :
      ( ( unpack1(X1_82,o) = X1_82 )
      | ( inv(pack1(X1_82)) = i ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_94]) ).

tff(c_207,plain,
    ! [X1_82] :
      ( ( pack1(X1_82) != i )
      | ( unpack1(X1_82,o) = X1_82 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_192,c_4]) ).

tff(c_258,plain,
    ! [X1_92] :
      ( ( pack1(inv(X1_92)) != i )
      | ( inv(X1_92) = X1_92 )
      | ( pack1(X1_92) = i ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_252,c_207]) ).

tff(c_331,plain,
    ! [X1_102] :
      ( ( pack1(inv(X1_102)) != i )
      | ( pack1(X1_102) = i ) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_258]) ).

tff(c_347,plain,
    ! [X1_92] : ( pack1(X1_92) = i ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_288,c_331]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [X1_3] : ( unpack1(X1_3,pack1(X1_3)) = X1_3 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_361,plain,
    ! [X1_3] : ( unpack1(X1_3,i) = X1_3 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_347,c_6]) ).

tff(c_57,plain,
    ! [X1_42] :
      ( ( unpack1(o,pack1(X1_42)) = X1_42 )
      | ( inv(X1_42) = i ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_48]) ).

tff(c_430,plain,
    ! [X1_127] :
      ( ( o = X1_127 )
      | ( inv(X1_127) = i ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_361,c_347,c_57]) ).

tff(c_460,plain,
    o = i,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_430,c_4]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    ! [X_1] :
      ( ( i = X_1 )
      | ( o != i ) ),
    inference(factorization,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    o != i,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_17]) ).

tff(c_469,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_460,c_30]) ).

tff(c_472,plain,
    ! [X_132] : ( i = X_132 ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_17]) ).

tff(c_474,plain,
    ! [X_2] : ( i != X_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_472,c_4]) ).

tff(c_470,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ( i = X_1 ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_17]) ).

tff(c_489,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_474,c_470]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : HWV052-1.001.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:15:09 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.11/1.89  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.90  
% 3.34/1.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.34/1.93  
% 3.34/1.93  Inference rules
% 3.34/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.34/1.93  #Ref     : 1
% 3.34/1.93  #Sup     : 112
% 3.34/1.93  #Fact    : 1
% 3.34/1.93  #Define  : 0
% 3.34/1.93  #Split   : 1
% 3.34/1.93  #Chain   : 0
% 3.34/1.93  #Close   : 0
% 3.34/1.93  
% 3.34/1.93  Ordering : KBO
% 3.34/1.93  
% 3.34/1.93  Simplification rules
% 3.34/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.34/1.93  #Subsume      : 22
% 3.34/1.93  #Demod        : 36
% 3.34/1.93  #Tautology    : 63
% 3.34/1.93  #SimpNegUnit  : 14
% 3.34/1.93  #BackRed      : 14
% 3.34/1.93  
% 3.34/1.93  #Partial instantiations: 23
% 3.34/1.93  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.34/1.93  
% 3.34/1.93  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.34/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.34/1.93  Preprocessing        : 0.39
% 3.34/1.93  Parsing              : 0.21
% 3.34/1.93  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.34/1.93  Main loop            : 0.38
% 3.34/1.93  Inferencing          : 0.17
% 3.34/1.93  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.34/1.93  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.34/1.93  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.34/1.93  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 3.34/1.93  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.34/1.93  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.34/1.93  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.34/1.93  Total                : 0.82
% 3.34/1.93  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.34/1.93  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.34/1.93  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.34/1.93  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------