TSTP Solution File: HWV034-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : HWV034-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:51:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.23s 0.51s
% Output : Saturation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named or_1_11)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
( value(in(n1,X1),n1)
| value(in(n2,X1),n1)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ value(out(n1,X1),n1) ),
or_1_11,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
( value(out(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ value(in(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ value(in(n2,X1),n1) ),
and_11_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
( value(out(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ value(in(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ value(in(n2,X1),n0) ),
or_00_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
( value(in(n1,X1),n0)
| value(in(n2,X1),n0)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ value(out(n1,X1),n0) ),
and_0_00,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
( value(out(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ value(in(X2,X1),n1) ),
or_1x_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
( value(out(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ value(in(X2,X1),n0) ),
and_0x_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
( value(out(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,not)
| ~ value(in(n1,X1),n0) ),
not_0_1_fw,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
( value(out(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,not)
| ~ value(in(n1,X1),n1) ),
not_1_0_fw,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
( value(in(n2,X1),n1)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ value(out(n1,X1),n1) ),
and_1_x1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
( value(in(n2,X1),n0)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ value(out(n1,X1),n0) ),
or_0_01,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
( value(in(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,not)
| ~ value(out(n1,X1),n0) ),
not_0_1_bw,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
( value(in(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ value(out(n1,X1),n1) ),
and_1_1x,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
( value(in(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,not)
| ~ value(out(n1,X1),n1) ),
not_1_0_bw,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
( value(in(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ value(out(n1,X1),n0) ),
or_0_0x,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
( mode(X1,ok)
| mode(X1,abnormal)
| ~ type(X1,X2) ),
ok_or_abnormal,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
( equal_value(X2,X3)
| ~ value(X1,X2)
| ~ value(X1,X3) ),
unique_value,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
( value(X1,X3)
| ~ connection(X1,X2)
| ~ value(X2,X3) ),
value_propagation2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,axiom,
( value(X2,X3)
| ~ connection(X1,X2)
| ~ value(X1,X3) ),
value_propagation1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
( ~ mode(X1,ok)
| ~ mode(X1,abnormal) ),
not_ok_and_abnormal,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,axiom,
~ equal_value(n1,n0),
equal_value2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
~ equal_value(n0,n1),
equal_value1,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : HWV034-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.15/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:03:18 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uMowXHnIlz/E---3.1_13416.p
% 0.23/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 13494 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.23/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.51 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 13502 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.23/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.51 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.51
% 0.23/0.51 # No proof found!
% 0.23/0.51 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.23/0.51 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.23/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Initial clauses : 21
% 0.23/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.23/0.51 # Processed clauses : 42
% 0.23/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 42
% 0.23/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.23/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.23/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 21
% 0.23/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 258
% 0.23/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 84
% 0.23/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1436
% 0.23/0.51
% 0.23/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.51 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.51 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.51 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 0.23/0.51
% 0.23/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.51 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/0.51 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.51 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.23/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.23/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------