TSTP Solution File: HWV030-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : HWV030-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:14:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : HWV030-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 07:39:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS derived 15 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 100 clauses.
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS allocated 75752 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.07 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 7 :
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.42 1[0:Inp] || -> p_Reset(t_139)*.
% 0.19/0.42 2[0:Inp] || gt(fifo_length,wr_level(plus(t_139,n1)))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.42 3[0:Inp] || -> gt(fifo_length,n0)*r.
% 0.19/0.42 30[0:Inp] p_Reset(u) || -> equal(wr_level(plus(u,n1)),n0)**.
% 0.19/0.42 178[0:Res:1.0,30.0] || -> equal(wr_level(plus(t_139,n1)),n0)**.
% 0.19/0.42 191[0:Rew:178.0,2.0] || gt(fifo_length,n0)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.42 192[0:MRR:191.0,3.0] || -> .
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : quest_1 quest_2 quest_3 axiom_27
% 0.19/0.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------