TSTP Solution File: HWV028-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : HWV028-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:12:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 6.69s 6.92s
% Output : Refutation 6.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : HWV028-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 22:28:11 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.39 Thu Jun 16 22:28:11 2022
% 0.21/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 18925.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 list(usable).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 189 during input processing: 0 [copy,144,flip.1] {-} n1=n1.
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 189 during input processing: 0 [copy,189,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.39 189 back subsumes 144.
% 0.21/0.39 189 back subsumes 119.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.46/0.63 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.46/0.63 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.46/0.63 number of clauses in intial UL: 121
% 0.46/0.63 number of clauses initially in problem: 179
% 0.46/0.63 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 67
% 0.46/0.63 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 78
% 0.46/0.63 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.46/0.63 absolute distinct symbol count: 55
% 0.46/0.63 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.46/0.63 distinct function count: 42
% 0.46/0.63 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.97/2.16
% 1.97/2.16
% 1.97/2.16 Changing weight limit from 60 to 58.
% 1.97/2.16
% 1.97/2.16 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 35 givens.
% 1.97/2.16
% 3.30/3.51
% 3.30/3.51
% 3.30/3.51 Changing weight limit from 58 to 20.
% 3.30/3.51
% 3.30/3.51 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 40 givens.
% 3.30/3.51
% 3.71/3.93
% 3.71/3.93
% 3.71/3.93 Changing weight limit from 20 to 16.
% 3.71/3.93
% 3.71/3.93 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 45 givens.
% 3.71/3.93
% 3.90/4.12
% 3.90/4.12
% 3.90/4.12 Changing weight limit from 16 to 11.
% 3.90/4.12
% 3.90/4.12 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 50 givens.
% 3.90/4.12
% 3.99/4.20
% 3.99/4.20
% 3.99/4.20 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 3.99/4.20
% 3.99/4.20 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 55 givens.
% 3.99/4.20
% 4.78/4.96
% 4.78/4.96
% 4.78/4.96 Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 4.78/4.96
% 4.78/4.96 Resetting weight limit to 9 after 65 givens.
% 4.78/4.96
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 -------- PROOF --------
% 6.69/6.92 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.69/6.92 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 6.42 sec ----> 19937 [binary,19936.1,103.1] {-} $F.
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 3.
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 6.69/6.92 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.69/6.92 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 7 [] {+} fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(A,n1))=n0| -p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(A)).
% 6.69/6.92 65 [] {+} -p_LES_EQU_(A,B)|p_LES_EQU_(C,B)|p_LES_EQU_(A,C).
% 6.69/6.92 102 [] {-} -p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)),fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_).
% 6.69/6.92 103 [] {+} -p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,n0).
% 6.69/6.92 134,133 [] {-} fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(A)=fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(A).
% 6.69/6.92 140 [] {-} p_LES_EQU_(A,A).
% 6.69/6.92 188 [] {-} p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)).
% 6.69/6.92 190 [back_demod,102,demod,134] {-} -p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)),fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_).
% 6.69/6.92 226 [hyper,140,65] {-} p_LES_EQU_(A,B)|p_LES_EQU_(B,A).
% 6.69/6.92 241,240 [hyper,188,7] {-} fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))=n0.
% 6.69/6.92 246 [back_demod,190,demod,241] {-} -p_LES_EQU_(n0,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_).
% 6.69/6.92 19936 [hyper,226,246] {-} p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,n0).
% 6.69/6.92 19937 [binary,19936.1,103.1] {-} $F.
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.69/6.92 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 ============ end of search ============
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 Process 18925 finished Thu Jun 16 22:28:18 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------