TSTP Solution File: HWV028-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : HWV028-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:10:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.65s
% Output   : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   9 unt;   1 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   3 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_5) ).

cnf(axiom_12,axiom,
    ( fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X,n1)) = n0
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_12) ).

cnf(axiom_71,axiom,
    ( ~ p_LES_EQU_(X,Y)
    | p_LES_EQU_(Z,Y)
    | p_LES_EQU_(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_71) ).

cnf(axiom_75,axiom,
    p_LES_EQU_(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_75) ).

cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
    p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).

cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)),fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).

cnf(134,plain,
    ~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)),fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[quest_2,axiom_5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).

cnf(219,plain,
    p_LES_EQU_(n0,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[axiom_71,axiom_75,quest_3]) ).

cnf(693,plain,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) = n0,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[axiom_12,quest_1]) ).

cnf(694,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[134,219,693,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem  : HWV028-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 22:18:45 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.42  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.42  * 
% 0.17/0.42  * 
% 0.17/0.43  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.43   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.17/0.43   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.17/0.43   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.17/0.43   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  "."
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T22:18:45
% 0.17/0.43  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T22:18:45
% 0.17/0.47  
% 0.46/0.65  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|f_ADD_| |n0| ?X) ?X).
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  #||
% 0.46/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/0.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.46/0.66  ||#
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.46/0.66  ;      1244 formulas have been input or derived (from 78 formulas).
% 0.46/0.66  ;       694 (56%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.46/0.66  ;           11 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.46/0.66  ;          683 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.46/0.66  ; 
% 0.46/0.66  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.025  11%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.003   1%   Assert                       (136 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.036  16%   Process new row              (1,105 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.047  21%   Resolution                   (154 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.002   1%   Paramodulation               (77 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (12 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.024  11%   Condensing                   (833 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.019   8%   Forward subsumption          (833 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.017   8%   Backward subsumption         (546 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.009   4%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,996 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.015   7%   Forward simplification       (1,105 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (693 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.004   2%   Ordering                     (3,340 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.023  10%   Other
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.224        Total
% 0.46/0.66  ;     0.225        Real time
% 0.46/0.66  ; 
% 0.46/0.66  ; Term-hash-array has 1,327 terms in all.
% 0.46/0.66  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 546 entries (546 at peak, 546 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.46/0.66  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,477 nodes (1,477 at peak, 1,477 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.46/0.66  ;  Retrieved 1,375 possibly forward subsuming rows in 833 calls.
% 0.46/0.66  ;  Retrieved 806 possibly backward subsumed rows in 546 calls.
% 0.46/0.66  ; Path-index has 1,319 entries (1,333 at peak, 1,335 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.46/0.66  ; Path-index has 1,840 nodes (1,876 at peak, 1,880 added, 40 deleted).
% 0.46/0.66  ; Trie-index has 1,319 entries (1,333 at peak, 1,335 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.46/0.66  ; Trie-index has 2,272 nodes (2,337 at peak, 2,346 added, 74 deleted).
% 0.46/0.66  ; Retrieved 338 generalization terms in 3,909 calls.
% 0.46/0.66  ; Retrieved 190 instance terms in 150 calls.
% 0.46/0.66  ; Retrieved 33,101 unifiable terms in 1,010 calls.
% 0.46/0.66  ; 
% 0.46/0.66  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.46/0.66  ;     8 with value 0
% 0.46/0.66  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 60 entries:
% 0.46/0.66  ;     2 with value 14              1 with value 27               2 with value 47
% 0.46/0.66  ;     2 with value 15              4 with value 28               1 with value 49
% 0.46/0.66  ;     6 with value 16              6 with value 29               1 with value 52
% 0.46/0.66  ;     5 with value 18              1 with value 30               3 with value 55
% 0.46/0.66  ;     1 with value 20              6 with value 31               1 with value 63
% 0.46/0.66  ;     1 with value 22              3 with value 33               1 with value 68
% 0.46/0.66  ;     3 with value 23              3 with value 36               1 with value 74
% 0.46/0.66  ;     3 with value 25              3 with value 41
% 0.46/0.66  ; The agenda of rows to give has 546 entries:
% 0.46/0.66  ;     5 with value (4 5)          10 with value (4 11)          53 with value (4 17)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     2 with value (4 6)          13 with value (4 12)          93 with value (4 18)
% 0.46/0.66  ;    35 with value (4 7)          57 with value (4 13)           6 with value (4 19)
% 0.46/0.66  ;     5 with value (4 8)          32 with value (4 14)          18 with value (4 20)
% 0.46/0.66  ;    29 with value (4 9)          10 with value (4 15)          90 with value (4 21)
% 0.46/0.66  ;    18 with value (4 10)         43 with value (4 16)          27 with value (4 24)
% 0.46/0.66  Evaluation took:
% 0.46/0.66    0.226 seconds of real time
% 0.46/0.66    0.201631 seconds of user run time
% 0.46/0.66    0.02334 seconds of system run time
% 0.46/0.66    [Run times include 0.01 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.46/0.66    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.46/0.66    0 page faults and
% 0.46/0.66    17,674,584 bytes consed.
% 0.46/0.66  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.46/0.66  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T22:18:45
% 0.46/0.66  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.46/0.66  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------