%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : HWV028-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:14:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : HWV028-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 07:14:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.17/0.42  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.17/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.42  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.17/0.42  SPASS derived 66 clauses, backtracked 26 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 167 clauses.
% 0.17/0.42  SPASS allocated 75801 KBytes.
% 0.17/0.42  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.17/0.42  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.17/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.17/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.17/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.17/0.42  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 12 :
% 0.17/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.42  1[0:Inp] ||  -> p_Reset(t_139)*.
% 0.17/0.42  2[0:Inp] ||  -> gt(level(plus(t_139,n1)),fifo_length)*l.
% 0.17/0.42  3[0:Inp] ||  -> gt(fifo_length,n0)*r.
% 0.17/0.42  16[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)* gt(v,w)* -> gt(u,w)*.
% 0.17/0.42  20[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> .
% 0.17/0.42  24[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(int_level(u),level(u))**.
% 0.17/0.42  29[0:Inp] p_Reset(u) ||  -> equal(int_level(plus(u,n1)),n0)**.
% 0.17/0.42  98[0:Rew:24.0,29.1] p_Reset(u) ||  -> equal(level(plus(u,n1)),n0)**.
% 0.17/0.42  177[0:Res:1.0,98.0] ||  -> equal(level(plus(t_139,n1)),n0)**.
% 0.17/0.42  190[0:Rew:177.0,2.0] ||  -> gt(n0,fifo_length)*l.
% 0.17/0.42  255[0:OCh:16.1,16.0,190.0,3.0] ||  -> gt(fifo_length,fifo_length)*.
% 0.17/0.42  256[0:MRR:255.0,20.0] ||  -> .
% 0.17/0.42  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.17/0.42  Formulae used in the proof : quest_1 quest_2 quest_3 axiom_13 axiom_17 axiom_21 axiom_26
% 0.17/0.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------