TSTP Solution File: HWV027-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : HWV027-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:55:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  12 unt;   2 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   7 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
    level(t_139) != level(plus(t_139,n1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.l0PNOHzTIK/E---3.1_25068.p',quest_4) ).

cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
    level(X1) = int_level(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.l0PNOHzTIK/E---3.1_25068.p',axiom_21) ).

cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_Rd(t_139),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.l0PNOHzTIK/E---3.1_25068.p',quest_2) ).

cnf(axiom_82,axiom,
    ( p_Reset(X1)
    | p_Wr(X1)
    | p_Rd(X1)
    | int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = int_level(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.l0PNOHzTIK/E---3.1_25068.p',axiom_82) ).

cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_Wr(t_139),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.l0PNOHzTIK/E---3.1_25068.p',quest_1) ).

cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_Reset(t_139),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.l0PNOHzTIK/E---3.1_25068.p',quest_3) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    level(t_139) != level(plus(t_139,n1)),
    quest_4 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    level(X1) = int_level(X1),
    axiom_21 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_Rd(t_139),
    quest_2 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( p_Reset(X1)
    | p_Wr(X1)
    | p_Rd(X1)
    | int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = int_level(X1) ),
    axiom_82 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) != int_level(t_139),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_Wr(t_139),
    quest_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_Reset(t_139),
    quest_3 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem    : HWV027-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.29  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.08/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 05:49:31 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.l0PNOHzTIK/E---3.1_25068.p
% 0.13/0.41  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.13/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # new_bool_3 with pid 25146 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.41  # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41  # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25149 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.13/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.41  # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41  # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.41  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 94
% 0.13/0.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 70
% 0.13/0.41  # Initial clauses                      : 24
% 0.13/0.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 24
% 0.13/0.41  # Processed clauses                    : 55
% 0.13/0.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.13/0.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 48
% 0.13/0.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.13/0.41  # Generated clauses                    : 33
% 0.13/0.41  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28
% 0.13/0.41  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.13/0.41  # Paramodulations                      : 30
% 0.13/0.41  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.13/0.41  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.13/0.41  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.13/0.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.13/0.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.13/0.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.13/0.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 13
% 0.13/0.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.13/0.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 60
% 0.13/0.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 0.13/0.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 38
% 0.13/0.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.13/0.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.13/0.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.13/0.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.13/0.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.13/0.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2098
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.41  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.41  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.13/0.41  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------