TSTP Solution File: HWV025-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : HWV025-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:14:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 5 unt; 9 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
~ p_Rd(t_139),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
~ p_Reset(t_139),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ p_Rd_error(t_139)
| ~ p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( p_Rd_error(t_139)
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(34,axiom,
( ~ p_Reset(u)
| ~ p_Rd_error(plus(u,n1)) ),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(53,axiom,
( ~ p_Wr(u)
| ~ p_Rd_error(plus(u,n1))
| p_Reset(u)
| p_Rd(u)
| p_Rd_error(u) ),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(54,axiom,
( ~ p_Wr(u)
| ~ p_Rd_error(u)
| p_Reset(u)
| p_Rd(u)
| p_Rd_error(plus(u,n1)) ),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(89,axiom,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(u,n1))
| p_Reset(u)
| p_Wr(u)
| p_Rd(u)
| p_Rd_error(u) ),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(90,axiom,
( ~ p_Rd_error(u)
| p_Reset(u)
| p_Wr(u)
| p_Rd(u)
| p_Rd_error(plus(u,n1)) ),
file('HWV025-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(101,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(u,n1))
| p_Wr(u)
| p_Rd(u)
| p_Rd_error(u) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[89,34]),
[iquote('0:MRR:89.1,34.0')] ).
cnf(104,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(u)
| p_Rd(u)
| p_Reset(u)
| p_Rd_error(plus(u,n1)) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[54,90]),
[iquote('0:MRR:54.0,90.2')] ).
cnf(105,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(u,n1))
| p_Rd_error(u)
| p_Rd(u) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[53,101,34]),
[iquote('0:MRR:53.0,53.2,101.1,34.0')] ).
cnf(194,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(t_139)
| p_Rd(t_139)
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[104,2]),
[iquote('0:Res:104.1,2.0')] ).
cnf(208,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Rd_error(t_139) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[105,1]),
[iquote('0:Res:105.1,1.0')] ).
cnf(215,plain,
p_Rd_error(t_139),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[208,4]),
[iquote('0:MRR:208.0,4.1')] ).
cnf(216,plain,
~ p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[3,215]),
[iquote('0:MRR:3.0,215.0')] ).
cnf(218,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[194,215,1,216]),
[iquote('0:MRR:194.0,194.1,194.2,215.0,1.0,216.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : HWV025-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 01:39:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.44 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS derived 39 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 96 clauses.
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS allocated 75786 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS spent 0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 17 :
% 0.19/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.44 Formulae used in the proof : quest_1 quest_2 quest_3 quest_4 axiom_30 axiom_49 axiom_50 axiom_85 axiom_86
% 0.19/0.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------