TSTP Solution File: HWV025-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : HWV025-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 unknown
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 1000MB
% OS : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/HWV/HWV025-1+eq_r.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: medium
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 25 #f 3 13)
% (binary-unit 9 #f 3 13)
% (binary-double 9 #f 3 13)
% (binary-double 15 #f)
% (binary-double 15 #t)
% (binary 50 #t 3 13)
% (binary-order 25 #f 3 13)
% (binary-posweight-order 101 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 25 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 9 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 50 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 25 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 50 #f)
% (binary-order 50 #f)
% (hyper-order 30 #f)
% (binary 112 #t)
%
%
% SOS clause
% -p_^rd_error(t_139) | -p_^rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)).
% was split for some strategies as:
% -p_^rd_error(t_139).
% -p_^rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)).
%
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(95,40,1,190,0,2)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 145 [] -p_^rd_error(plus(X,n1)) | -p_^wr(X) | p_^rd(X) | p_^rd_error(X) | p_^reset(X).
% 146 [] p_^rd_error(plus(X,n1)) | -p_^wr(X) | -p_^rd_error(X) | p_^rd(X) | p_^reset(X).
% 181 [] -p_^rd_error(plus(X,n1)) | p_^rd(X) | p_^wr(X) | p_^rd_error(X) | p_^reset(X).
% 187 [] -p_^rd(t_139).
% 188 [] -p_^reset(t_139).
% 189 [] -p_^rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) | -p_^rd_error(t_139).
% 190 [] p_^rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) | p_^rd_error(t_139).
% 210 [hyper:181,190,cut:187,cut:188] p_^wr(t_139) | p_^rd_error(t_139).
% 212 [?] ?
% 221 [hyper:189,210,binarycut:212] p_^wr(t_139).
% 257 [hyper:146,221,190,cut:187,cut:188] p_^rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)).
% 328 [hyper:145,210,binarycut:190,cut:187,cut:188] p_^rd_error(t_139).
% 329 [hyper:189,328,cut:257] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 13
% clause depth limited to 3
% seconds given: 12
%
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 31
% derived clauses: 238
% kept clauses: 38
% kept size sum: 338
% kept mid-nuclei: 80
% kept new demods: 3
% forw unit-subs: 78
% forw double-subs: 13
% forw overdouble-subs: 4
% backward subs: 5
% fast unit cutoff: 16
% full unit cutoff: 0
% dbl unit cutoff: 2
% real runtime : 0.3
% process. runtime: 0.2
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 101
% length fails: 16
% strength fails: 26
% predlist fails: 53
% aux str. fails: 0
% by-lit fails: 0
% full subs tried: 4
% full subs fail: 2
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/HWV/HWV025-1+eq_r.in")
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------