TSTP Solution File: HWV019-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : HWV019-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:12:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.87s 2.08s
% Output : Refutation 1.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.17 % Problem : HWV019-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.14/0.18 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.40 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.40 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.40 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.40 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.40 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 07:21:23 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.44 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.23/0.44 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.23/0.44 Fri Jun 17 07:21:23 2022
% 0.23/0.44 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26028.
% 0.23/0.44
% 0.23/0.44 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.23/0.44 set(auto).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.23/0.44 clear(print_given).
% 0.23/0.44
% 0.23/0.44 list(usable).
% 0.23/0.44
% 0.23/0.44 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.23/0.44
% 0.23/0.44 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.23/0.44 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.23/0.44 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.23/0.44 clauses in usable.
% 0.23/0.44
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.23/0.44 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.23/0.44
% 0.23/0.44 ------------> process usable:
% 0.23/0.44
% 0.23/0.44 ------------> process sos:
% 0.23/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 190 during input processing: 0 [copy,144,flip.1] {-} n1=n1.
% 0.23/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 190 during input processing: 0 [copy,190,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.23/0.44 190 back subsumes 144.
% 0.23/0.44 190 back subsumes 119.
% 0.23/0.44
% 0.23/0.44 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.42/0.69 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.42/0.69 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.42/0.69 number of clauses in intial UL: 121
% 0.42/0.69 number of clauses initially in problem: 180
% 0.42/0.69 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 67
% 0.42/0.69 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 77
% 0.42/0.69 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.42/0.69 absolute distinct symbol count: 57
% 0.42/0.69 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.42/0.69 distinct function count: 42
% 0.42/0.69 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.87/2.08
% 1.87/2.08 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.87/2.08 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.87/2.08 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.62 sec ----> 4940 [binary,4939.1,102.1] {-} $F.
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.87/2.09 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.87/2.09 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 17 [] {+} -p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(A,n1)))|p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(A))|p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(A))| -p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(A))|p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(A)).
% 1.87/2.09 37 [] {+} -p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(A,n1)))| -p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(A))| -p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(A))|p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(A)).
% 1.87/2.09 102 [] {+} -p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)).
% 1.87/2.09 103 [] {-} -p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206)).
% 1.87/2.09 134,133 [] {-} fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(A)=fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(A).
% 1.87/2.09 188 [] {-} p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))).
% 1.87/2.09 189 [] {-} p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)).
% 1.87/2.09 191 [back_demod,103,demod,134] {-} -p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206)).
% 1.87/2.09 3835 [hyper,188,17,189,unit_del,191,102] {-} p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)).
% 1.87/2.09 4939 [hyper,3835,37,188,189] {-} p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)).
% 1.87/2.09 4940 [binary,4939.1,102.1] {-} $F.
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.87/2.09 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 ============ end of search ============
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.87/2.09
% 1.87/2.09 Process 26028 finished Fri Jun 17 07:21:25 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------