TSTP Solution File: HWV019-2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : HWV019-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:55:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.33s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  10 unt;   2 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (   2 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_41,axiom,
    ( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0yEmdGZeKz/E---3.1_26294.p',axiom_41) ).

cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
    ( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0yEmdGZeKz/E---3.1_26294.p',axiom_13) ).

cnf(axiom_22,axiom,
    ( p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1))
    | p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
    | p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0yEmdGZeKz/E---3.1_26294.p',axiom_22) ).

cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0yEmdGZeKz/E---3.1_26294.p',quest_4) ).

cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0yEmdGZeKz/E---3.1_26294.p',axiom_5) ).

cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
    p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0yEmdGZeKz/E---3.1_26294.p',quest_1) ).

cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
    p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0yEmdGZeKz/E---3.1_26294.p',quest_3) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
    axiom_41 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1)) ),
    axiom_13 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1))
    | p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
    | p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
    axiom_22 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206)),
    quest_4 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
    axiom_5 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
    | ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
    quest_1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
    quest_3 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.22  % Problem    : HWV019-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.10/0.23  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.46  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.46  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.46  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.46  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.46  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.46  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 06:21:22 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.46  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.33/0.60  Running first-order model finding
% 0.33/0.60  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0yEmdGZeKz/E---3.1_26294.p
% 0.33/0.62  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.33/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # new_bool_3 with pid 26372 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.33/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.33/0.62  # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.62  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 26375 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.33/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.33/0.62  # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.62  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/0.62  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.62  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.33/0.62  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.33/0.62  
% 0.33/0.62  # Proof found!
% 0.33/0.62  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.33/0.62  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/0.62  # Parsed axioms                        : 137
% 0.33/0.62  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 103
% 0.33/0.62  # Initial clauses                      : 34
% 0.33/0.62  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 34
% 0.33/0.62  # Processed clauses                    : 63
% 0.33/0.62  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.33/0.62  # ...remaining for further processing  : 60
% 0.33/0.62  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.33/0.62  # Generated clauses                    : 17
% 0.33/0.62  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.33/0.62  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 0.33/0.62  # Paramodulations                      : 16
% 0.33/0.62  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.33/0.62  # Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 0.33/0.62  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.33/0.62  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.33/0.62  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/0.62  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.33/0.62  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/0.62  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.33/0.62  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.33/0.62  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.33/0.62  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.33/0.62  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.33/0.62  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.33/0.62  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.33/0.62  # Current number of processed clauses  : 26
% 0.33/0.62  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.33/0.62  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/0.62  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.33/0.62  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.33/0.62  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.33/0.62  # ...number of literals in the above   : 58
% 0.33/0.62  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Current number of archived clauses   : 34
% 0.33/0.62  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 71
% 0.33/0.62  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.33/0.62  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
% 0.33/0.62  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.33/0.62  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.33/0.62  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.33/0.62  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.33/0.62  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2864
% 0.33/0.62  
% 0.33/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.62  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.33/0.62  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.33/0.62  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.33/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1840 pages
% 0.33/0.62  
% 0.33/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.62  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.33/0.62  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.33/0.62  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.33/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.33/0.62  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------