TSTP Solution File: HWV019-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : HWV019-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:58:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 28 ~; 23 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 5 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f733,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f732,f101]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
p_Wr_error(sF1),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f91,f100]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
plus(t_139,n1) = sF1,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
fof(f91,axiom,
p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
fof(f732,plain,
~ p_Wr_error(sF1),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f731,f100]) ).
fof(f731,plain,
~ p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f730,f92]) ).
fof(f92,axiom,
p_Wr(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
fof(f730,plain,
( ~ p_Wr(t_139)
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f729,f93]) ).
fof(f93,axiom,
~ p_Reset(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
fof(f729,plain,
( p_Reset(t_139)
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| ~ p_Wr(t_139) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f711,f51]) ).
fof(f51,axiom,
! [X34] :
( ~ p_Rd(X34)
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X34,n1))
| ~ p_Wr(X34)
| p_Reset(X34) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_51) ).
fof(f711,plain,
p_Rd(t_139),
inference(resolution,[],[f700,f99]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
( gt(fifo_length,sF0)
| p_Rd(t_139) ),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f94,f98]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
level(t_139) = sF0,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
fof(f94,axiom,
( gt(fifo_length,level(t_139))
| p_Rd(t_139) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
fof(f700,plain,
~ gt(fifo_length,sF0),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f699,f101]) ).
fof(f699,plain,
( ~ gt(fifo_length,sF0)
| ~ p_Wr_error(sF1) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f698,f100]) ).
fof(f698,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| ~ gt(fifo_length,sF0) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f697,f98]) ).
fof(f697,plain,
( ~ gt(fifo_length,level(t_139))
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f693,f93]) ).
fof(f693,plain,
( ~ gt(fifo_length,level(t_139))
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Reset(t_139) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f116,f92]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
! [X34] :
( ~ p_Wr(X34)
| p_Reset(X34)
| ~ gt(fifo_length,level(X34))
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X34,n1)) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f115,f21]) ).
fof(f21,axiom,
! [X25] : level(X25) = int_level(X25),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_21) ).
fof(f115,plain,
! [X34] :
( p_Reset(X34)
| ~ p_Wr(X34)
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X34,n1))
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(X34)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f34,f51]) ).
fof(f34,axiom,
! [X34] :
( p_Reset(X34)
| p_Rd(X34)
| ~ p_Wr(X34)
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(X34))
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X34,n1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_34) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : HWV019-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 23:07:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 % (2159)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)Time elapsed: 0.077 s
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 % (2151)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)Time elapsed: 0.097 s
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)Instructions burned: 37 (million)
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (2159)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (2143)Success in time 0.163 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------