TSTP Solution File: HWV014-2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : HWV014-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:55:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 15 unt; 2 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 7 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_5,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FlipSeCeEl/E---3.1_22427.p',quest_5) ).
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FlipSeCeEl/E---3.1_22427.p',axiom_5) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FlipSeCeEl/E---3.1_22427.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_43,axiom,
( fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)) = f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n1)
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n0)
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FlipSeCeEl/E---3.1_22427.p',axiom_43) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FlipSeCeEl/E---3.1_22427.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FlipSeCeEl/E---3.1_22427.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FlipSeCeEl/E---3.1_22427.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n1),
quest_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
axiom_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n0),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206),n1) != fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)) = f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n1)
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n0)
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1)) ),
axiom_43 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
quest_4 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206),n0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
quest_3 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.09 % Problem : HWV014-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 05:55:27 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FlipSeCeEl/E---3.1_22427.p
% 0.14/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # new_bool_3 with pid 22514 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.42 # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42 # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 22517 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.14/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.42 # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42 # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.42 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 138
% 0.14/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 111
% 0.14/0.42 # Initial clauses : 27
% 0.14/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.14/0.42 # Processed clauses : 105
% 0.14/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # ...subsumed : 25
% 0.14/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 80
% 0.14/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.14/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.14/0.42 # Generated clauses : 144
% 0.14/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 113
% 0.14/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.14/0.42 # Paramodulations : 143
% 0.14/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.14/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 47
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 45
% 0.14/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.14/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.14/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 29
% 0.14/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56
% 0.14/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 185
% 0.14/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 35
% 0.14/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 158
% 0.14/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 107
% 0.14/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 24
% 0.14/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.14/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.14/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.14/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4000
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.42 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1836 pages
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
% 0.14/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------