TSTP Solution File: HWV014-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7jOtv84vZU true
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 03:04:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.35s 0.97s
% Output : Refutation 1.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.16 % Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.17 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7jOtv84vZU true
% 0.13/0.38 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 16:14:06 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.38 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.19/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.19/0.38 % Running in FO mode
% 0.19/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.19/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.19/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.28/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.29/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.29/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.29/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.29/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.29/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.34/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.35/0.97 % Solved by fo/fo13.sh.
% 1.35/0.97 % done 161 iterations in 0.154s
% 1.35/0.97 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.35/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.35/0.97 thf(gt_type, type, gt: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(p_Rd_type, type, p_Rd: $i > $o).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(x_139_type, type, x_139: $i).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(level_type, type, level: $i > $i).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(int_level_type, type, int_level: $i > $i).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(minus_type, type, minus: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(n1_type, type, n1: $i).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(plus_type, type, plus: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(p_Wr_type, type, p_Wr: $i > $o).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(p_Reset_type, type, p_Reset: $i > $o).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(quest_1, conjecture, (~( gt @ ( level @ x_139 ) @ n0 ))).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (gt @ ( level @ x_139 ) @ n0),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [quest_1])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain, ( (gt @ (level @ x_139) @ n0)),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(axiom_21, axiom, (( level @ X_t_32 ) = ( int_level @ X_t_32 ))).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((level @ X0) = (int_level @ X0))),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_21])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl95, plain, ( (gt @ (int_level @ x_139) @ n0)),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl90, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(axiom_71, axiom,
% 1.35/0.97 (( p_Reset @ X_t_42 ) | ( p_Wr @ X_t_42 ) | ( ~( p_Rd @ X_t_42 ) ) |
% 1.35/0.97 ( ~( gt @ ( int_level @ X_t_42 ) @ n0 ) ) |
% 1.35/0.97 ( ( int_level @ ( plus @ X_t_42 @ n1 ) ) =
% 1.35/0.97 ( minus @ ( int_level @ X_t_42 ) @ n1 ) ))).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl70, plain,
% 1.35/0.97 (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.35/0.97 ( (p_Reset @ X0)
% 1.35/0.97 | (p_Wr @ X0)
% 1.35/0.97 | ~ (p_Rd @ X0)
% 1.35/0.97 | ~ (gt @ (int_level @ X0) @ n0)
% 1.35/0.97 | ((int_level @ (plus @ X0 @ n1)) = (minus @ (int_level @ X0) @ n1)))),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_71])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl691, plain,
% 1.35/0.97 (( (p_Reset @ x_139)
% 1.35/0.97 | (p_Wr @ x_139)
% 1.35/0.97 | ~ (p_Rd @ x_139)
% 1.35/0.97 | ((int_level @ (plus @ x_139 @ n1))
% 1.35/0.97 = (minus @ (int_level @ x_139) @ n1)))),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl95, zip_derived_cl70])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(quest_4, conjecture, (p_Reset @ x_139)).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (~( p_Reset @ x_139 )),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [quest_4])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl93, plain, (~ (p_Reset @ x_139)),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(quest_3, conjecture, (p_Wr @ x_139)).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture, (~( p_Wr @ x_139 )),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [quest_3])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl92, plain, (~ (p_Wr @ x_139)),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(quest_2, conjecture, (~( p_Rd @ x_139 ))).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zf_stmt_3, negated_conjecture, (p_Rd @ x_139),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [quest_2])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl91, plain, ( (p_Rd @ x_139)),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl698, plain,
% 1.35/0.97 (((int_level @ (plus @ x_139 @ n1)) = (minus @ (int_level @ x_139) @ n1))),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.35/0.97 [zip_derived_cl691, zip_derived_cl93, zip_derived_cl92,
% 1.35/0.97 zip_derived_cl91])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(quest_5, conjecture,
% 1.35/0.97 (( level @ ( plus @ x_139 @ n1 ) ) = ( minus @ ( level @ x_139 ) @ n1 ))).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zf_stmt_4, negated_conjecture,
% 1.35/0.97 (( level @ ( plus @ x_139 @ n1 ) ) != ( minus @ ( level @ x_139 ) @ n1 )),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [quest_5])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl94, plain,
% 1.35/0.97 (((level @ (plus @ x_139 @ n1)) != (minus @ (level @ x_139) @ n1))),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_4])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((level @ X0) = (int_level @ X0))),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_21])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((level @ X0) = (int_level @ X0))),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_21])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl96, plain,
% 1.35/0.97 (((int_level @ (plus @ x_139 @ n1)) != (minus @ (int_level @ x_139) @ n1))),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.35/0.97 [zip_derived_cl94, zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 1.35/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl699, plain, ($false),
% 1.35/0.97 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 1.35/0.97 [zip_derived_cl698, zip_derived_cl96])).
% 1.35/0.97
% 1.35/0.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.35/0.97
% 1.35/0.97
% 1.35/0.97 % Terminating...
% 2.29/1.11 % Runner terminated.
% 2.34/1.13 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------