TSTP Solution File: HWV014-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:12:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.66s 0.92s
% Output   : Refutation 0.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 04:40:00 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.39  The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.39  Fri Jun 17 04:40:00 2022
% 0.21/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 14896.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  list(usable).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.39  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.39  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.39  clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 101 during input processing: 0 [copy,92,flip.1] {-} n1=n1.
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 101 during input processing: 0 [copy,101,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.39  101 back subsumes 92.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.66/0.92  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.66/0.92  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.66/0.92  number of clauses in intial UL: 82
% 0.66/0.92  number of clauses initially in problem: 97
% 0.66/0.92  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.66/0.92  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.66/0.92  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.66/0.92  absolute distinct symbol count: 24
% 0.66/0.92     distinct predicate count: 13
% 0.66/0.92     distinct function count: 7
% 0.66/0.92     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.66/0.92  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.66/0.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.50 sec ----> 140 [hyper,99,63,100,unit_del,82,81,102] {-} $F.
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 1.
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.66/0.92  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.66/0.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  63 [] {+} p_Reset(A)|p_Wr(A)| -p_Rd(A)| -gt(int_level(A),n0)|int_level(plus(A,n1))=minus(int_level(A),n1).
% 0.66/0.92  81 [] {+} -p_Wr(x_139).
% 0.66/0.92  82 [] {+} -p_Reset(x_139).
% 0.66/0.92  83 [] {-} level(plus(x_139,n1))!=minus(level(x_139),n1).
% 0.66/0.92  94,93 [] {-} level(A)=int_level(A).
% 0.66/0.92  98 [] {-} gt(level(x_139),n0).
% 0.66/0.92  99 [copy,98,demod,94] {-} gt(int_level(x_139),n0).
% 0.66/0.92  100 [] {-} p_Rd(x_139).
% 0.66/0.92  102 [back_demod,83,demod,94,94] {-} int_level(plus(x_139,n1))!=minus(int_level(x_139),n1).
% 0.66/0.92  140 [hyper,99,63,100,unit_del,82,81,102] {-} $F.
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.66/0.92  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  ============ end of search ============
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.66/0.92  
% 0.66/0.92  Process 14896 finished Fri Jun 17 04:40:01 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------