TSTP Solution File: HWV014-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:55:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 408.35s 300.13s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 15 unt; 2 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 7 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_5,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ydHud7b5JV/E---3.1_3106.p',quest_5) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ydHud7b5JV/E---3.1_3106.p',axiom_21) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(x_139),n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ydHud7b5JV/E---3.1_3106.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_71,axiom,
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ydHud7b5JV/E---3.1_3106.p',axiom_71) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ydHud7b5JV/E---3.1_3106.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ydHud7b5JV/E---3.1_3106.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ydHud7b5JV/E---3.1_3106.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
quest_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(x_139),n0),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
minus(int_level(x_139),n1) != int_level(plus(x_139,n1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0) ),
axiom_71 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(x_139),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
gt(int_level(x_139),n0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
quest_3 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
quest_4 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 05:49:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ydHud7b5JV/E---3.1_3106.p
% 408.35/300.13 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 408.35/300.13 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.35/300.13 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # new_bool_1 with pid 3185 completed with status 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 408.35/300.13 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.35/300.13 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.35/300.13 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 408.35/300.13 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3188 completed with status 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 408.35/300.13 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.35/300.13 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.35/300.13 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 408.35/300.13 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.35/300.13 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.35/300.13 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 408.35/300.13 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 408.35/300.13
% 408.35/300.13 # Proof found!
% 408.35/300.13 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 408.35/300.13 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 408.35/300.13 # Parsed axioms : 95
% 408.35/300.13 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 28
% 408.35/300.13 # Initial clauses : 67
% 408.35/300.13 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Initial clauses in saturation : 67
% 408.35/300.13 # Processed clauses : 237
% 408.35/300.13 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # ...subsumed : 63
% 408.35/300.13 # ...remaining for further processing : 174
% 408.35/300.13 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Backward-subsumed : 17
% 408.35/300.13 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 408.35/300.13 # Generated clauses : 473
% 408.35/300.13 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 322
% 408.35/300.13 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 49
% 408.35/300.13 # Paramodulations : 468
% 408.35/300.13 # Factorizations : 4
% 408.35/300.13 # NegExts : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 408.35/300.13 # Total rewrite steps : 160
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional check models : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 408.35/300.13 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 408.35/300.13 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 408.35/300.13 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 408.35/300.13 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 408.35/300.13 # Current number of processed clauses : 102
% 408.35/300.13 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 408.35/300.13 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 408.35/300.13 # Non-unit-clauses : 87
% 408.35/300.13 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 203
% 408.35/300.13 # ...number of literals in the above : 1023
% 408.35/300.13 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Current number of archived clauses : 72
% 408.35/300.13 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1823
% 408.35/300.13 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 571
% 408.35/300.13 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 108
% 408.35/300.13 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 408.35/300.13 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 408.35/300.13 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 408.35/300.13 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Condensation successes : 0
% 408.35/300.13 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11143
% 408.35/300.13
% 408.35/300.13 # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.35/300.13 # User time : 0.022 s
% 408.35/300.13 # System time : 0.002 s
% 408.35/300.13 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 408.35/300.13 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 408.35/300.13
% 408.35/300.13 # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.35/300.13 # User time : 0.024 s
% 408.35/300.13 # System time : 0.005 s
% 408.35/300.13 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 408.35/300.13 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 408.35/300.13 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------