TSTP Solution File: HWV014-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:51:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 13 unt; 3 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 7 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_71,axiom,
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uuBkX2Kb3v/E---3.1_2407.p',axiom_71) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uuBkX2Kb3v/E---3.1_2407.p',axiom_21) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(x_139),n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uuBkX2Kb3v/E---3.1_2407.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uuBkX2Kb3v/E---3.1_2407.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(quest_5,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uuBkX2Kb3v/E---3.1_2407.p',quest_5) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uuBkX2Kb3v/E---3.1_2407.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uuBkX2Kb3v/E---3.1_2407.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0) ),
axiom_71 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(level(X1),n1)
| p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(level(X1),n0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(x_139),n0),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(x_139),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
quest_5 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
quest_3 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
quest_4 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14 % Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 05:49:21 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uuBkX2Kb3v/E---3.1_2407.p
% 0.22/0.54 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2489 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2496 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 95
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses : 95
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 94
% 0.22/0.54 # Processed clauses : 148
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 147
% 0.22/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.22/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 16
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Generated clauses : 139
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 116
% 0.22/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 61
% 0.22/0.54 # Paramodulations : 131
% 0.22/0.54 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.22/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 19
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 41
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 133
% 0.22/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 476
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 94
% 0.22/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2078
% 0.22/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 375
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 78
% 0.22/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.22/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6000
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.068 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.077 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.22/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------