TSTP Solution File: HWV011-3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : HWV011-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:55:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   7 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OZxZh5YG9U/E---3.1_15031.p',quest_1) ).

cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OZxZh5YG9U/E---3.1_15031.p',axiom_5) ).

cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfull_(t_206)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OZxZh5YG9U/E---3.1_15031.p',quest_2) ).

cnf(axiom_6,axiom,
    ( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfull_(X1))
    | fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1) != fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_ ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OZxZh5YG9U/E---3.1_15031.p',axiom_6) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,
    quest_1 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
    axiom_5 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfull_(t_206)),
    quest_2 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfull_(X1))
    | fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1) != fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_ ),
    axiom_6 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : HWV011-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 05:38:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OZxZh5YG9U/E---3.1_15031.p
% 0.20/0.49  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # new_bool_1 with pid 15110 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15113 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 135
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 107
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 28
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 0.20/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 36
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 34
% 0.20/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.20/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.20/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 59
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 27
% 0.20/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 98
% 0.20/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.20/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2391
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1840 pages
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------