TSTP Solution File: HWV010-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : HWV010-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 unknown
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1000MB
% OS       : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/HWV/HWV010-1+eq_r.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: medium
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 25 #f 3 13)
% (binary-unit 9 #f 3 13)
% (binary-double 9 #f 3 13)
% (binary-double 15 #f)
% (binary-double 15 #t)
% (binary 50 #t 3 13)
% (binary-order 25 #f 3 13)
% (binary-posweight-order 101 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 25 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 9 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 50 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 25 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 50 #f)
% (binary-order 50 #f)
% (hyper-order 30 #f)
% (binary 112 #t)
% 
% 
% SOS clause 
% -p_^empty(t_139) | -equal(level(t_139),n0).
% was split for some strategies as: 
% -p_^empty(t_139).
% -equal(level(t_139),n0).
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(93,40,1,186,0,1)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 118 [] -equal(level(X),n0) | p_^empty(X).
% 119 [] equal(level(X),n0) | -p_^empty(X).
% 185 [] -equal(level(t_139),n0) | -p_^empty(t_139).
% 186 [?] ?
% 194 [input:185,binarycut:119] -p_^empty(t_139).
% 214 [input:186,binarycut:118] p_^empty(t_139).
% 217 [hyper:194,214] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 13
% clause depth limited to 3
% seconds given: 12
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    10
%  derived clauses:   37
%  kept clauses:      13
%  kept size sum:     102
%  kept mid-nuclei:   13
%  kept new demods:   3
%  forw unit-subs:    7
%  forw double-subs: 1
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     2
%  fast unit cutoff:  0
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  2
%  real runtime  :  0.1
%  process. runtime:  0.1
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           0
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  0
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/HWV/HWV010-1+eq_r.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------