TSTP Solution File: HWV009-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : HWV009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JUv7cmgOIE true
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 03:04:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.18s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 1.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : HWV009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JUv7cmgOIE true
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 17:31:20 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.18/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.18/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.18/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.18/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.18/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.18/0.79 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.18/0.79 % BCE start: 92
% 1.18/0.79 % BCE eliminated: 4
% 1.18/0.79 % PE start: 88
% 1.18/0.79 logic: eq
% 1.18/0.79 % PE eliminated: 4
% 1.18/0.79 % done 31 iterations in 0.043s
% 1.18/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.18/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.18/0.79 thf(p_Rd_error_type, type, p_Rd_error: $i > $o).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(t_139_type, type, t_139: $i).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(level_type, type, level: $i > $i).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(int_level_type, type, int_level: $i > $i).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(n1_type, type, n1: $i).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(p_Wr_error_type, type, p_Wr_error: $i > $o).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(plus_type, type, plus: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(p_Reset_type, type, p_Reset: $i > $o).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(axiom_26, axiom,
% 1.18/0.79 (( ~( p_Reset @ X_t_37 ) ) |
% 1.18/0.79 ( ( int_level @ ( plus @ X_t_37 @ n1 ) ) = ( n0 ) ))).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (p_Reset @ X0) | ((int_level @ (plus @ X0 @ n1)) = (n0)))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_26])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(quest_2, conjecture,
% 1.18/0.79 (~( ( p_Rd_error @ ( plus @ t_139 @ n1 ) ) |
% 1.18/0.79 ( p_Wr_error @ ( plus @ t_139 @ n1 ) ) |
% 1.18/0.79 ( ( level @ ( plus @ t_139 @ n1 ) ) != ( n0 ) ) ))).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.18/0.79 (( p_Rd_error @ ( plus @ t_139 @ n1 ) ) |
% 1.18/0.79 ( p_Wr_error @ ( plus @ t_139 @ n1 ) ) |
% 1.18/0.79 ( ( level @ ( plus @ t_139 @ n1 ) ) != ( n0 ) )),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [quest_2])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl91, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 (( (p_Rd_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | (p_Wr_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | ((level @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1)) != (n0)))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(axiom_21, axiom, (( level @ X_t_32 ) = ( int_level @ X_t_32 ))).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((level @ X0) = (int_level @ X0))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_21])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1136, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 (( (p_Rd_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | (p_Wr_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | ((int_level @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1)) != (n0)))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl91, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1140, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 ((~ (p_Reset @ t_139)
% 1.18/0.79 | (p_Rd_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | (p_Wr_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | ((n0) != (n0)))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl1136])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(quest_1, conjecture, (~( p_Reset @ t_139 ))).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (p_Reset @ t_139),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [quest_1])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain, ( (p_Reset @ t_139)),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1142, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 (( (p_Rd_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | (p_Wr_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | ((n0) != (n0)))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1140, zip_derived_cl90])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1143, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 (( (p_Wr_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))
% 1.18/0.79 | (p_Rd_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1)))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1142])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(axiom_29, axiom,
% 1.18/0.79 (( ~( p_Reset @ X_t_37 ) ) | ( ~( p_Wr_error @ ( plus @ X_t_37 @ n1 ) ) ))).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (p_Reset @ X0) | ~ (p_Wr_error @ (plus @ X0 @ n1)))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_29])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1147, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 (( (p_Rd_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1)) | ~ (p_Reset @ t_139))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1143, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain, ( (p_Reset @ t_139)),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1148, plain, ( (p_Rd_error @ (plus @ t_139 @ n1))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1147, zip_derived_cl90])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(axiom_30, axiom,
% 1.18/0.79 (( ~( p_Reset @ X_t_37 ) ) | ( ~( p_Rd_error @ ( plus @ X_t_37 @ n1 ) ) ))).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 1.18/0.79 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (p_Reset @ X0) | ~ (p_Rd_error @ (plus @ X0 @ n1)))),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_30])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1152, plain, (~ (p_Reset @ t_139)),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1148, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain, ( (p_Reset @ t_139)),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 1.18/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1153, plain, ($false),
% 1.18/0.79 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1152, zip_derived_cl90])).
% 1.18/0.79
% 1.18/0.79 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.18/0.79
% 1.18/0.79
% 1.18/0.79 % Terminating...
% 1.62/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.62/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------