%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : HWV008-1.002 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:32:03 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.08s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19251/HWV/HWV008-1.002+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 166] [nf = 0] [nu = 80] [ut = 83]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 967] [nf = 2] [nu = 368] [ut = 132]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2900] [nf = 36] [nu = 896] [ut = 148]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 18502] [nf = 76] [nu = 4752] [ut = 314]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 90377] [nf = 1149] [nu = 18193] [ut = 334]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 500013] [nf = 4092] [nu = 68172] [ut = 334]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 40 secs [nr = 2176078] [nf = 19998] [nu = 253145] [ut = 334]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 5755329] [nf = 45724] [nu = 545269] [ut = 334]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 5756398] [nf = 45726] [nu = 545713] [ut = 334]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 5758922] [nf = 45770] [nu = 546485] [ut = 334]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 125 secs [nr = 5906749] [nf = 45830] [nu = 572181] [ut = 398]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 135 secs [nr = 6641504] [nf = 61987] [nu = 656486] [ut = 398]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 14549106
% 	resolvents: 14444513	factors: 104593
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1233845
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 8.48
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 14	[1] = 69	[2] = 49	[3] = 16	
% [4] = 230	[5] = 20	
% Total = 398
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1233845	[2] = 8222372	[3] = 4827593	[4] = 265296	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] connection_2	(+)61	(-)222
% [1] equal_value_2	(+)2	(-)2
% [2] mode_2		(+)3	(-)3
% [3] type_2		(+)25	(-)0
% [4] value_2		(+)40	(-)40
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)131	(-)267
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 398
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 33626870
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 14549106
% Number of unification failures: 1251098241
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 15155
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 597405491
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 239849594
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 33254
% Max entries in substitution set: 13
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 979708
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 14
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 1502
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3723
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.40
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 66
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1265647347
% ConstructUnitClause() = 980092
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 1.42 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 48497
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------