TSTP Solution File: HWV006-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : HWV006-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:30:56 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18909/HWV/HWV006-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 102] [nf = 0] [nu = 48] [ut = 50]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 515] [nf = 2] [nu = 211] [ut = 79]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1698] [nf = 24] [nu = 501] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10650] [nf = 56] [nu = 3656] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 41923] [nf = 687] [nu = 12527] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 191690] [nf = 2272] [nu = 46251] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 761214] [nf = 10239] [nu = 164118] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 2818209] [nf = 43607] [nu = 557275] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 104 secs [nr = 9249036] [nf = 187221] [nu = 1817569] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 10854993] [nf = 226512] [nu = 2120059] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 10855552] [nf = 226514] [nu = 2120316] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 10856956] [nf = 226546] [nu = 2120714] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 10918470] [nf = 226594] [nu = 2139525] [ut = 354]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 126 secs [nr = 11198582] [nf = 234517] [nu = 2203221] [ut = 380]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 178 secs [nr = 15789938] [nf = 261284] [nu = 2967402] [ut = 403]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 27188749
% resolvents: 26585104 factors: 603645
% Number of unit clauses generated: 4636940
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 17.05
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 13 [1] = 37 [2] = 29 [3] = 12
% [4] = 263 [5] = 26 [6] = 23
% Total = 403
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 4636940 [2] = 14440768 [3] = 7375753 [4] = 735288
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] connection_2 (+)26 (-)300
% [1] equal_value_2 (+)2 (-)2
% [2] mode_2 (+)5 (-)5
% [3] type_2 (+)12 (-)1
% [4] value_2 (+)25 (-)25
% ------------------
% Total: (+)70 (-)333
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 403
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 50721264
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 4216828
% Number of successful unifications: 27188749
% Number of unification failures: 1041476078
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 8466
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 644409184
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 392119142
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 27664
% Max entries in substitution set: 16
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3579366
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 10
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 4
% Number of states in UCFA table: 941
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3167
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 112000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.30
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 60
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1068664827
% ConstructUnitClause() = 3579756
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 5.18 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 90629
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------