TSTP Solution File: HWV005-2 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : HWV005-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2006MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:32:33 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.01s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5638/HWV/HWV005-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 54] [nf = 0] [nu = 34] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 344] [nf = 0] [nu = 98] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1726] [nf = 17] [nu = 528] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7630] [nf = 225] [nu = 1847] [ut = 151]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 40925] [nf = 626] [nu = 10870] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 165565] [nf = 3405] [nu = 42544] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 646824] [nf = 10890] [nu = 136737] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 11 secs [nr = 2146722] [nf = 45753] [nu = 473456] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 36 secs [nr = 6703743] [nf = 167775] [nu = 1418297] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 117 secs [nr = 20734201] [nf = 486623] [nu = 4296055] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 21541893] [nf = 507547] [nu = 4412456] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 21542309] [nf = 507547] [nu = 4412575] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 21544251] [nf = 507564] [nu = 4413424] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 21550678] [nf = 507791] [nu = 4414991] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 21588451] [nf = 508215] [nu = 4425568] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 21713091] [nf = 510994] [nu = 4457242] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 125 secs [nr = 22194350] [nf = 518479] [nu = 4551435] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 133 secs [nr = 23694248] [nf = 553342] [nu = 4888154] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 159 secs [nr = 28251269] [nf = 675364] [nu = 5832995] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 239 secs [nr = 42281727] [nf = 994212] [nu = 8710753] [ut = 171]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 55137900
% 	resolvents: 53877923	factors: 1259977
% Number of unit clauses generated: 11155370
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 20.23
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 8		[1] = 17	[2] = 15	[3] = 47	
% [4] = 64	[5] = 20	
% Total = 171
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 11155370	[2] = 26652402	[3] = 17330128	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] abnormal_1		(+)0	(-)3
% [1] and_ok_1		(+)1	(-)2
% [2] halfadder_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [3] logic_and_1		(+)2	(-)2
% [4] logic_not_1		(+)1	(-)1
% [5] logic_or_1		(+)1	(-)1
% [6] not_ok_1		(+)1	(-)1
% [7] one_1		(+)7	(-)8
% [8] or_ok_1		(+)1	(-)2
% [9] zero_1		(+)8	(-)7
% [10] connection_2	(+)9	(-)112
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)32	(-)139
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 171
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 301254268
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 55137900
% Number of unification failures: 689194332
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 1131
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 922990431
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 696869914
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 1692
% Max entries in substitution set: 12
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 7496782
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 6
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 3
% Number of states in UCFA table: 284
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 783
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 96000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.36
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 55
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 744332232
% ConstructUnitClause() = 7496945
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 9.66 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 183793
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------