TSTP Solution File: HWV005-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : HWV005-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:01:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.81s 1.09s
% Output   : Refutation 0.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : HWV005-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 23:21:30 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.81/1.08  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.81/1.08  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.81/1.08  Process 2632 was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.81/1.08  Thu Jun 16 23:21:31 2022
% 0.81/1.08  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_2478_n021.cluster.edu".
% 0.81/1.08  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_2478_n021.cluster.edu
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.81/1.08  set(auto2).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.81/1.08      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.81/1.08      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.81/1.08      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.81/1.08  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.81/1.08  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.81/1.08  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.81/1.08  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.81/1.08  clear(print_given).
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (42 formulas)
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.81/1.08  
% 0.81/1.08  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.81/1.08  1 -value(A,B) | -value(A,C) | equal_value(B,C) # label(unique_value) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  2 -equal_value(n0,n1) # label(equal_value1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  3 -equal_value(n1,n0) # label(equal_value2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -value(A,n0) | -value(A,n1).  [resolve(1,c,2,a)].
% 0.81/1.08  4 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(in(n1,A),in(n1,or1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_in1_in1or1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  5 -connection(A,B) | -value(A,C) | value(B,C) # label(value_propagation1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  6 -connection(A,B) | -value(B,C) | value(A,C) # label(value_propagation2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,A),B) | value(in(n1,or1(A)),B).  [resolve(4,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,or1(A)),B) | value(in(n1,A),B).  [resolve(4,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.08  7 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(in(n2,A),in(n2,or1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_in2_in2or1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n2,A),B) | value(in(n2,or1(A)),B).  [resolve(7,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n2,or1(A)),B) | value(in(n2,A),B).  [resolve(7,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.08  8 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(in(n1,A),in(n1,and2(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_in1_in1and2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,A),B) | value(in(n1,and2(A)),B).  [resolve(8,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,and2(A)),B) | value(in(n1,A),B).  [resolve(8,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.08  9 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(in(n2,A),in(n2,and2(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_in2_in2and2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n2,A),B) | value(in(n2,and2(A)),B).  [resolve(9,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.08  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n2,and2(A)),B) | value(in(n2,A),B).  [resolve(9,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  10 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(s,A),out(n1,and1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_outs_out1and1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(s,A),B) | value(out(n1,and1(A)),B).  [resolve(10,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(n1,and1(A)),B) | value(out(s,A),B).  [resolve(10,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  11 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(c,A),out(n1,and2(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_outc_out1and2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(c,A),B) | value(out(n1,and2(A)),B).  [resolve(11,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(n1,and2(A)),B) | value(out(c,A),B).  [resolve(11,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  12 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(n1,or1(A)),in(n1,and1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_out1or1_in1_and1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(n1,or1(A)),B) | value(in(n1,and1(A)),B).  [resolve(12,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,and1(A)),B) | value(out(n1,or1(A)),B).  [resolve(12,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  13 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(n1,and2(A)),in(n1,not1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_out1and2_in1not1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(n1,and2(A)),B) | value(in(n1,not1(A)),B).  [resolve(13,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,not1(A)),B) | value(out(n1,and2(A)),B).  [resolve(13,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  14 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(n1,not1(A)),in(n2,and1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_out1not1_in2and1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(n1,not1(A)),B) | value(in(n2,and1(A)),B).  [resolve(14,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  Derived: -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n2,and1(A)),B) | value(out(n1,not1(A)),B).  [resolve(14,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.81/1.09  Function symbol KB weights:  n1=1. halfadder=1. n0=1. n2=1. ok=1. and=1. or=1. h=1. not=1. c=1. s=1. abnormal=1. in=1. out=1. and2=1. and1=1. or1=1. not1=1.
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.81/1.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.81/1.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.81/1.09  % Length of proof is 50.
% 0.81/1.09  % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.81/1.09  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.81/1.09  % Given clauses 79.
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  1 -value(A,B) | -value(A,C) | equal_value(B,C) # label(unique_value) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  2 -equal_value(n0,n1) # label(equal_value1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  4 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(in(n1,A),in(n1,or1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_in1_in1or1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  5 -connection(A,B) | -value(A,C) | value(B,C) # label(value_propagation1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  6 -connection(A,B) | -value(B,C) | value(A,C) # label(value_propagation2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  10 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(s,A),out(n1,and1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_outs_out1and1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  11 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(c,A),out(n1,and2(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_outc_out1and2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  12 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(n1,or1(A)),in(n1,and1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_out1or1_in1_and1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  13 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(n1,and2(A)),in(n1,not1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_out1and2_in1not1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  14 -type(A,halfadder) | connection(out(n1,not1(A)),in(n2,and1(A))) # label(halfadder_connection_out1not1_in2and1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  15 type(h,halfadder) # label(h_isa_halfadder) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  16 value(in(n1,h),n1) # label(in1_1) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  18 value(out(s,h),n0) # label(outs_0) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  19 value(out(c,h),n0) # label(outc_0) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  20 -mode(and1(h),abnormal) # label(diagnosis_and1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  21 -mode(not1(h),abnormal) # label(diagnosis_not1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  22 -mode(or1(h),abnormal) # label(diagnosis_or1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  24 -type(A,halfadder) | type(and1(A),and) # label(halfadder_and1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  26 -type(A,halfadder) | type(not1(A),not) # label(halfadder_not1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  27 -type(A,halfadder) | type(or1(A),or) # label(halfadder_or1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  28 -type(A,B) | mode(A,ok) | mode(A,abnormal) # label(ok_or_abnormal) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  33 -mode(A,ok) | -type(A,or) | -value(out(n1,A),n0) | value(in(n1,A),n0) # label(or_0_0x) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  37 -mode(A,ok) | -type(A,not) | -value(out(n1,A),n0) | value(in(n1,A),n1) # label(not_0_1_bw) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  40 -mode(A,ok) | -type(A,and) | -value(out(n1,A),n0) | value(in(n1,A),n0) | value(in(n2,A),n0) # label(and_0_00) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.81/1.09  43 -value(A,n0) | -value(A,n1).  [resolve(1,c,2,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  45 -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,or1(A)),B) | value(in(n1,A),B).  [resolve(4,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  52 -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(s,A),B) | value(out(n1,and1(A)),B).  [resolve(10,b,5,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  55 -type(A,halfadder) | -value(out(n1,and2(A)),B) | value(out(c,A),B).  [resolve(11,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  57 -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,and1(A)),B) | value(out(n1,or1(A)),B).  [resolve(12,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  59 -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n1,not1(A)),B) | value(out(n1,and2(A)),B).  [resolve(13,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  61 -type(A,halfadder) | -value(in(n2,and1(A)),B) | value(out(n1,not1(A)),B).  [resolve(14,b,6,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  62 type(and1(h),and).  [resolve(24,a,15,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  64 type(not1(h),not).  [resolve(26,a,15,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  65 type(or1(h),or).  [resolve(27,a,15,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  67 -value(out(c,h),n1).  [resolve(43,a,19,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  70 -value(in(n1,h),n0).  [ur(43,b,16,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  89 mode(and1(h),ok).  [resolve(62,a,28,a),unit_del(b,20)].
% 0.81/1.09  90 -value(out(n1,and2(h)),n1).  [ur(55,a,15,a,c,67,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  95 -value(in(n1,or1(h)),n0).  [ur(45,a,15,a,c,70,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  97 mode(not1(h),ok).  [resolve(64,a,28,a),unit_del(b,21)].
% 0.81/1.09  98 mode(or1(h),ok).  [resolve(65,a,28,a),unit_del(b,22)].
% 0.81/1.09  100 -value(out(n1,and1(h)),n0) | value(in(n1,and1(h)),n0) | value(in(n2,and1(h)),n0).  [resolve(89,a,40,a),unit_del(a,62)].
% 0.81/1.09  109 -value(in(n1,not1(h)),n1).  [ur(59,a,15,a,c,90,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  114 -value(out(n1,not1(h)),n0).  [resolve(97,a,37,a),unit_del(a,64),unit_del(c,109)].
% 0.81/1.09  127 -value(out(n1,or1(h)),n0).  [resolve(98,a,33,a),unit_del(a,65),unit_del(c,95)].
% 0.81/1.09  136 -value(in(n2,and1(h)),n0).  [ur(61,a,15,a,c,114,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  138 -value(out(n1,and1(h)),n0) | value(in(n1,and1(h)),n0).  [back_unit_del(100),unit_del(c,136)].
% 0.81/1.09  139 -value(in(n1,and1(h)),n0).  [ur(57,a,15,a,c,127,a)].
% 0.81/1.09  141 -value(out(n1,and1(h)),n0).  [back_unit_del(138),unit_del(b,139)].
% 0.81/1.09  144 $F.  [ur(52,b,18,a,c,141,a),unit_del(a,15)].
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  Given=79. Generated=172. Kept=129. proofs=1.
% 0.81/1.09  Usable=79. Sos=26. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=85. Hints=0.
% 0.81/1.09  Megabytes=0.18.
% 0.81/1.09  User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.81/1.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.81/1.09  
% 0.81/1.09  Process 2632 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 23:21:31 2022
% 0.81/1.09  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------