TSTP Solution File: HWV005-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : HWV005-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:30:42 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP15440/HWV/HWV005-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48] [nf = 0] [nu = 26] [ut = 23]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 281] [nf = 2] [nu = 120] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 885] [nf = 20] [nu = 300] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4666] [nf = 44] [nu = 1724] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15463] [nf = 466] [nu = 5680] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 57086] [nf = 1330] [nu = 16740] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 200715] [nf = 5211] [nu = 58419] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 593711] [nf = 18483] [nu = 160137] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 1791705] [nf = 59106] [nu = 475694] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 29 secs [nr = 4970775] [nf = 195206] [nu = 1351629] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 82 secs [nr = 13807697] [nf = 519433] [nu = 3706697] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 20283002] [nf = 779410] [nu = 5415845] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 20283291] [nf = 779412] [nu = 5415977] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 20283971] [nf = 779440] [nu = 5416195] [ut = 94]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 20305979] [nf = 779479] [nu = 5424141] [ut = 164]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 20389891] [nf = 783778] [nu = 5451567] [ut = 164]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 21393473] [nf = 794635] [nu = 5674215] [ut = 166]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 157 secs [nr = 25941261] [nf = 1076144] [nu = 6757284] [ut = 166]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 50071769
% resolvents: 48274186 factors: 1797583
% Number of unit clauses generated: 10861258
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 21.69
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 10 [1] = 13 [2] = 21 [3] = 8
% [4] = 112 [6] = 2
% Total = 166
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 10861258 [2] = 23743672 [3] = 13580303 [4] = 1886536
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] connection_2 (+)9 (-)112
% [1] equal_value_2 (+)2 (-)2
% [2] mode_2 (+)3 (-)3
% [3] type_2 (+)5 (-)0
% [4] value_2 (+)15 (-)15
% ------------------
% Total: (+)34 (-)132
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 166
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 82750490
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 50071769
% Number of unification failures: 798564652
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 1246
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 640550014
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 386678694
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 828
% Max entries in substitution set: 19
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 7708279
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 8
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 3
% Number of states in UCFA table: 348
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 1086
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 112000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.32
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 57
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 848636421
% ConstructUnitClause() = 7708435
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 10.64 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 166906
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------