TSTP Solution File: HWV003-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : HWV003-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:12:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 1.52s 1.69s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : HWV003-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 06:07:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Fri Jun 17 06:07:45 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20024.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.13/0.36  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [copy,3,flip.1] {-} or(A,B)=or(B,A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] {-} and(A,B)=and(B,A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [copy,40,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [copy,47,flip.1] {-} xor(A,B)=xor(B,A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [copy,86,flip.1] {-} and(or(and(not(A),B),A),or(and(not(A),B),not(B)))=xor(A,B).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.13/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 67
% 0.13/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 1
% 0.13/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 23
% 0.13/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 21
% 0.13/0.39     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.13/0.39     distinct function count: 4
% 0.13/0.39     distinct constant count: 16
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 1.46/1.69  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.46/1.69  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.46/1.69  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 6 [ 3 0 155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 7 [ 5 0 128 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 8 [ 3 1 270 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 9 [ 2 0 196 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 10 [ 2 0 147 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 11 [ 3 1 71 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 12 [ 2 0 232 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 13 [ 4 1 214 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 14 [ 1 1 254 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 15 [ 2 1 312 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 16 [ 9 1 71 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 17 [ 7 0 160 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 18 [ 14 0 84 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 19 [ 2 0 639 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 20 [ 12 0 124 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 21 [ 9 1 483 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 22 [ 17 1 302 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  true clauses given           3      (12.5%)
% 1.46/1.69  false clauses given         21
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.46/1.69     7  7         6
% 1.46/1.69     8  5         0
% 1.46/1.69     9  2         1
% 1.46/1.69    10  4         0
% 1.46/1.69    11  7         5
% 1.46/1.69    13  2         2
% 1.46/1.69    17  2         0
% 1.46/1.69    18  2         0
% 1.46/1.69    26  1         0
% 1.46/1.69  tot:  32        14      (30.4% true)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  Model 22 [ 17 1 302 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 1.46/1.69  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.46/1.69  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.46/1.69  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  
% 1.46/1.69  The job finished Fri Jun 17 06:07:46 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------