TSTP Solution File: HEN012-3 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : HEN012-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:58:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.68s 1.90s
% Output   : Refutation 1.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   6 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ less_e_qual(A,B)
    | divide(A,B) = zero ),
    file('HEN012-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( divide(A,B) != zero
    | less_e_qual(A,B) ),
    file('HEN012-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ less_e_qual(A,B)
    | ~ less_e_qual(B,A)
    | A = B ),
    file('HEN012-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ less_e_qual(a,a),
    file('HEN012-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    less_e_qual(divide(A,B),A),
    file('HEN012-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    less_e_qual(divide(divide(A,B),divide(C,B)),divide(divide(A,C),B)),
    file('HEN012-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    less_e_qual(zero,A),
    file('HEN012-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    divide(divide(A,B),A) = zero,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1')] ).

cnf(34,plain,
    less_e_qual(divide(divide(A,A),divide(B,A)),zero),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,7]),
    [iquote('para_from,16.1.1,7.1.2')] ).

cnf(49,plain,
    divide(divide(A,A),divide(B,A)) = zero,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[34,3,8])]),
    [iquote('hyper,34,3,8,flip.1')] ).

cnf(74,plain,
    less_e_qual(divide(A,A),divide(B,A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[49,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,49,2')] ).

cnf(85,plain,
    divide(A,A) = zero,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[74,3,6]),17])]),
    [iquote('hyper,74,3,6,demod,17,flip.1')] ).

cnf(87,plain,
    less_e_qual(A,A),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[85,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,85,2')] ).

cnf(88,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[87,4]),
    [iquote('binary,87.1,4.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : HEN012-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 08:21:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.68/1.90  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.68/1.90  The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 1.68/1.90  Wed Jul 27 08:21:18 2022
% 1.68/1.90  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 19789.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.68/1.90  set(auto).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.68/1.90  clear(print_given).
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  list(usable).
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] A=A.
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] -less_e_qual(X,Y)|divide(X,Y)=zero.
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] divide(X,Y)!=zero|less_e_qual(X,Y).
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] less_e_qual(divide(X,Y),X).
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] less_e_qual(divide(divide(X,Z),divide(Y,Z)),divide(divide(X,Y),Z)).
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] less_e_qual(zero,X).
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] -less_e_qual(X,Y)| -less_e_qual(Y,X)|X=Y.
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] less_e_qual(X,identity).
% 1.68/1.90  0 [] -less_e_qual(a,a).
% 1.68/1.90  end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.68/1.90  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.68/1.90  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.68/1.90     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  ------------> process usable:
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -less_e_qual(A,B)|divide(A,B)=zero.
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] divide(A,B)!=zero|less_e_qual(A,B).
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 3 [] -less_e_qual(A,B)| -less_e_qual(B,A)|A=B.
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] -less_e_qual(a,a).
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  ------------> process sos:
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [] A=A.
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 6 [] less_e_qual(divide(A,B),A).
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 7 [] less_e_qual(divide(divide(A,B),divide(C,B)),divide(divide(A,C),B)).
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 8 [] less_e_qual(zero,A).
% 1.68/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 9 [] less_e_qual(A,identity).
% 1.68/1.90    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,5,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 88 [binary,87.1,4.1] $F.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 6.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.68/1.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.68/1.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.68/1.90  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  ============ end of search ============
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.68/1.90  clauses given                 20
% 1.68/1.90  clauses generated            239
% 1.68/1.90  clauses kept                  78
% 1.68/1.90  clauses forward subsumed     180
% 1.68/1.90  clauses back subsumed          2
% 1.68/1.90  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.68/1.90  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.68/1.90  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.68/1.90  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.68/1.90  
% 1.68/1.90  Process 19789 finished Wed Jul 27 08:21:19 2022
% 1.68/1.90  Otter interrupted
% 1.68/1.90  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------