TSTP Solution File: HEN011-5 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : HEN011-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 12:52:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 31.79s 31.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 31.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : HEN011-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 13:50:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.19/0.38 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.38 #
% 0.19/0.38 # Number of axioms: 14 Number of unprocessed: 14
% 0.19/0.38 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.38 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.38 # Hello from C++
% 5.98/6.21 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 5.98/6.21 # Local unification is enabled...
% 5.98/6.21 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 5.98/6.21 # 14 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 5.98/6.21 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 5.98/6.21 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 5.98/6.21 # Found 9 unit axioms.
% 5.98/6.21 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 5.98/6.21 # 5 extension rule candidate clauses
% 5.98/6.21 # 9 unit axiom clauses
% 5.98/6.21
% 5.98/6.21 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 5.98/6.21 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 31.79/31.97 # There were 5 total branch saturation attempts.
% 31.79/31.97 # There were 2 of these attempts blocked.
% 31.79/31.97 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 31.79/31.97 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 31.79/31.97 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 31.79/31.97 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 31.79/31.97 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 31.79/31.97 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 31.79/31.97 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 31.79/31.97 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 31.79/31.97 # Begin clausification derivation
% 31.79/31.97
% 31.79/31.97 # End clausification derivation
% 31.79/31.97 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (divide(X1,identity)=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (divide(zero,X1)=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (divide(X1,zero)=X1)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (divide(X1,X1)=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (divide(divide(X1,X2),X1)=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (X1=X2|divide(X2,X1)!=zero|divide(X1,X2)!=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (divide(X1,X3)=zero|divide(X2,X3)!=zero|divide(X1,X2)!=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (divide(divide(X3,X2),divide(X3,X1))=zero|divide(X1,X2)!=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (divide(divide(X1,X3),divide(X2,X3))=zero|divide(X1,X2)!=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (divide(identity,divide(identity,divide(identity,X1)))=divide(identity,X1))).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (divide(divide(X1,X3),X2)=zero|divide(divide(X1,X2),X3)!=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (divide(divide(identity,X1),divide(identity,divide(identity,X1)))=divide(identity,X1))).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)),divide(divide(X1,X3),X2))=zero)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,b)))!=divide(divide(identity,b),divide(identity,divide(identity,a))))).
% 31.79/31.97 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 31.79/31.97 # Begin printing tableau
% 31.79/31.97 # Found 6 steps
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,b)))!=divide(divide(identity,b),divide(identity,divide(identity,a)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,b)))!=divide(divide(identity,b),divide(identity,divide(identity,a)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (divide(divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,b))),divide(divide(identity,b),divide(identity,divide(identity,a))))!=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_641905, plain, (divide(zero,divide(divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,b))),divide(divide(identity,b),divide(identity,divide(identity,a)))))!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (divide(divide(divide(identity,b),divide(identity,divide(identity,a))),divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,b))))!=zero), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_31, ...])).
% 31.79/31.97 cnf(i_0_641906, plain, (divide(divide(divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,b))),divide(divide(identity,b),divide(identity,divide(identity,a)))),zero)!=zero), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_641906, ...])).
% 31.79/31.97 # End printing tableau
% 31.79/31.97 # SZS output end
% 31.79/31.97 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 31.79/31.97 # Returning from population with 4 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 31.79/31.97 # We now have 4 tableaux to operate on
% 31.79/31.97 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 31.79/31.97 # Proof search is over...
% 31.79/31.97 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------