TSTP Solution File: HEN007-2 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : HEN007-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 13:00:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.70s 1.06s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : HEN007-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 13:26:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.70/1.06  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.70/1.06  Process 30884 was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.70/1.06  Fri Jul  1 13:26:11 2022
% 0.70/1.06  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_30730_n014.cluster.edu".
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_30730_n014.cluster.edu
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.70/1.06  set(auto2).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.70/1.06      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.70/1.06      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.70/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.70/1.06  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.70/1.06  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.70/1.06  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.70/1.06  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.70/1.06  clear(print_given).
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  Auto_denials:
% 0.70/1.06    % copying label prove_zQyLEzQx to answer in negative clause
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.70/1.06  Function symbol KB weights:  zero=1. identity=1. x=1. y=1. z=1. zQx=1. zQy=1. divide=1.
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.70/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/1.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  % Proof 1 at 0.08 (+ 0.01) seconds: prove_zQyLEzQx.
% 0.70/1.06  % Length of proof is 18.
% 0.70/1.06  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.70/1.06  % Maximum clause weight is 23.000.
% 0.70/1.06  % Given clauses 35.
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  3 less_equal(x,y) # label(xLEy) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  7 quotient(A,zero,A) # label(x_divde_zero_is_x) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  8 quotient(z,y,zQy) # label(zQy) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  9 quotient(z,x,zQx) # label(zQx) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  10 quotient(A,B,divide(A,B)) # label(closure) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  11 -less_equal(zQy,zQx) # label(prove_zQyLEzQx) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_zQyLEzQx).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  12 -less_equal(A,B) | quotient(A,B,zero) # label(quotient_less_equal) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  14 -quotient(A,B,C) | less_equal(C,A) # label(divisor_existence) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  16 -less_equal(A,B) | -less_equal(B,C) | less_equal(A,C) # label(transitivity_of_less_equal) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  17 -quotient(A,B,C) | -quotient(A,B,D) | C = D # label(well_defined) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  19 -quotient(A,B,C) | -quotient(B,D,E) | -quotient(A,D,F) | -quotient(F,E,V6) | -quotient(C,D,V7) | less_equal(V6,V7) # label(quotient_property) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/1.06  20 quotient(x,y,zero).  [hyper(12,a,3,a)].
% 0.70/1.06  23 less_equal(divide(A,B),A).  [hyper(14,a,10,a)].
% 0.70/1.06  29 divide(z,x) = zQx.  [hyper(17,a,10,a,b,9,a)].
% 0.70/1.06  31 divide(A,zero) = A.  [hyper(17,a,10,a,b,7,a)].
% 0.70/1.06  66 less_equal(zQy,divide(zQx,y)).  [hyper(19,a,10,a,b,20,a,c,8,a,d,10,a,e,10,a),rewrite([31(3),29(4)])].
% 0.70/1.06  210 -less_equal(zQy,divide(zQx,A)) # answer(prove_zQyLEzQx).  [ur(16,b,23,a,c,11,a)].
% 0.70/1.06  211 $F # answer(prove_zQyLEzQx).  [resolve(210,a,66,a)].
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  Given=35. Generated=4128. Kept=210. proofs=1.
% 0.70/1.06  Usable=35. Sos=145. Demods=9. Limbo=13, Disabled=35. Hints=0.
% 0.70/1.06  Megabytes=0.15.
% 0.70/1.06  User_CPU=0.08, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.70/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.70/1.06  
% 0.70/1.06  Process 30884 exit (max_proofs) Fri Jul  1 13:26:11 2022
% 0.70/1.06  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------