TSTP Solution File: HEN006-4 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : HEN006-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 12:10:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 10 ~; 9 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 19 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f385,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f381,f14]) ).
fof(f14,axiom,
~ less_equal(divide(a,d),b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_divide_d_LE_b) ).
fof(f381,plain,
less_equal(divide(a,d),b),
inference(resolution,[],[f376,f59]) ).
fof(f59,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ less_equal(X0,divide(X1,X2))
| less_equal(X0,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f12,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : less_equal(divide(X0,X1),X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quotient_smaller_than_numerator) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ less_equal(X0,X1)
| less_equal(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_less_equal) ).
fof(f376,plain,
less_equal(divide(a,d),divide(b,d)),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f364]) ).
fof(f364,plain,
( zero != zero
| less_equal(divide(a,d),divide(b,d)) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f2,f247]) ).
fof(f247,plain,
zero = divide(divide(a,d),divide(b,d)),
inference(resolution,[],[f148,f49]) ).
fof(f49,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ less_equal(X0,zero)
| zero = X0 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f6,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0] : less_equal(zero,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',zero_is_smallest) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ less_equal(X1,X0)
| ~ less_equal(X0,X1)
| X0 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_equal_and_equal) ).
fof(f148,plain,
less_equal(divide(divide(a,d),divide(b,d)),zero),
inference(superposition,[],[f4,f20]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
zero = divide(divide(a,b),d),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
less_equal(divide(a,b),d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_divide_b_LE_d) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ less_equal(X0,X1)
| divide(X0,X1) = zero ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quotient_less_equal1) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,X2),divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(X0,X1),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quotient_property) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( divide(X0,X1) != zero
| less_equal(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quotient_less_equal2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : HEN006-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Apr 29 21:57:49 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 % (29603)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.39 % (29606)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.39 % (29607)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (29604)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (29605)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (29608)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (29609)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (29606)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (29610)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [4]
% 0.14/0.40 TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.40 % (29610)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)Memory used [KB]: 876
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (29606)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (29603)Success in time 0.028 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------