TSTP Solution File: HEN006-4 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : HEN006-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 13:02:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : HEN006-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 14:43:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Fri Jul  1 14:43:14 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 19674.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.13/0.36  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [copy,19,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.19/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.19/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 26
% 0.19/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.19/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.19/0.40     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.40     distinct function count: 1
% 0.19/0.40     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.03 sec ----> 123 [binary,122.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  1 [] {+} -less_equal(A,B)|divide(A,B)=zero.
% 0.19/0.41  2 [] {+} divide(A,B)!=zero|less_equal(A,B).
% 0.19/0.41  3 [] {+} -less_equal(A,B)| -less_equal(B,A)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.41  4 [] {+} -less_equal(A,B)| -less_equal(B,C)|less_equal(A,C).
% 0.19/0.41  5 [] {+} -less_equal(divide(a,d),b).
% 0.19/0.41  6 [] {+} less_equal(divide(A,B),A).
% 0.19/0.41  7 [] {-} less_equal(divide(divide(A,B),divide(C,B)),divide(divide(A,C),B)).
% 0.19/0.41  8 [] {+} less_equal(zero,A).
% 0.19/0.41  18 [] {-} less_equal(divide(a,b),d).
% 0.19/0.41  26 [hyper,18,1] {-} divide(divide(a,b),d)=zero.
% 0.19/0.41  59 [para_from,26.1.1,7.1.2] {-} less_equal(divide(divide(a,d),divide(b,d)),zero).
% 0.19/0.41  96 [hyper,59,3,8,flip.1] {-} divide(divide(a,d),divide(b,d))=zero.
% 0.19/0.41  111 [hyper,96,2] {-} less_equal(divide(a,d),divide(b,d)).
% 0.19/0.41  122 [hyper,111,4,6] {-} less_equal(divide(a,d),b).
% 0.19/0.41  123 [binary,122.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  true clauses given           6      (31.6%)
% 0.19/0.41  false clauses given         13
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.19/0.41     5  0         1
% 0.19/0.41     7  0         2
% 0.19/0.41     9  0         3
% 0.19/0.41    10  3         0
% 0.19/0.41    11  10        4
% 0.19/0.41    12  0         1
% 0.19/0.41    13  14        1
% 0.19/0.41    14  2         0
% 0.19/0.41    15  22        0
% 0.19/0.41    17  11        0
% 0.19/0.41    19  2         0
% 0.19/0.41    21  5         0
% 0.19/0.41    23  1         0
% 0.19/0.41    25  1         0
% 0.19/0.41  tot:  71        12      (14.5% true)
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Process 19674 finished Fri Jul  1 14:43:14 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------