TSTP Solution File: HEN005-3 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : HEN005-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 12:52:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : HEN005-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 13:50:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 10 Number of unprocessed: 10
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.36 # 10 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.36 # Found 7 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.36 # 3 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # 7 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, hypothesis, (less_equal(a,b))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_19, hypothesis, (less_equal(b,c))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (less_equal(X1,identity))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (less_equal(zero,X1))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (~less_equal(a,c))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (divide(X1,X2)=zero|~less_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (less_equal(X1,X2)|divide(X1,X2)!=zero)).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (less_equal(divide(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (X1=X2|~less_equal(X2,X1)|~less_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (less_equal(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)),divide(divide(X1,X3),X2)))).
% 0.18/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.36 # Found 5 steps
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (~less_equal(a,c)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (~less_equal(a,c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (divide(a,c)!=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~less_equal(zero,divide(a,c))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (~less_equal(divide(a,c),zero)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_35, ...])).
% 0.18/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.36 # Returning from population with 1 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.18/0.36 # We now have 1 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.36 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.18/0.36 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.36 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------