TSTP Solution File: HEN005-3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : HEN005-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:42:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.54s 1.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  18 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  18   ~;  15   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (;  32   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ less_equal > divide > #nlpp > zero > identity > c > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(less_equal,type,
    less_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(divide,type,
    divide: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(identity,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(c,type,
    c: $i ).

tff(f_53,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( divide(X,Y) != zero )
      | less_equal(X,Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_81,axiom,
    ~ less_equal(a,c),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_79,axiom,
    less_equal(b,c),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_48,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ less_equal(X,Y)
      | ( divide(X,Y) = zero ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_62,axiom,
    ! [X] : less_equal(zero,X),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_78,axiom,
    less_equal(a,b),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [X,Z,Y] : less_equal(divide(divide(X,Z),divide(Y,Z)),divide(divide(X,Y),Z)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_71,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ less_equal(X,Y)
      | ~ less_equal(Y,X)
      | ( X = Y ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ! [X_21,Y_22] :
      ( less_equal(X_21,Y_22)
      | ( divide(X_21,Y_22) != zero ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_53]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ~ less_equal(a,c),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_81]) ).

tff(c_72,plain,
    divide(a,c) != zero,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_20]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    less_equal(b,c),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [X_18,Y_19] :
      ( ( divide(X_18,Y_19) = zero )
      | ~ less_equal(X_18,Y_19) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    divide(b,c) = zero,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_24]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [X_10] : less_equal(zero,X_10),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_62]) ).

tff(c_41,plain,
    ! [X_10] : ( divide(zero,X_10) = zero ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_24]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    less_equal(a,b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_78]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    divide(a,b) = zero,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_24]) ).

tff(c_162,plain,
    ! [X_28,Z_29,Y_30] : less_equal(divide(divide(X_28,Z_29),divide(Y_30,Z_29)),divide(divide(X_28,Y_30),Z_29)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [Y_12,X_11] :
      ( ( Y_12 = X_11 )
      | ~ less_equal(Y_12,X_11)
      | ~ less_equal(X_11,Y_12) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_854,plain,
    ! [X_49,Z_50,Y_51] :
      ( ( divide(divide(X_49,Z_50),divide(Y_51,Z_50)) = divide(divide(X_49,Y_51),Z_50) )
      | ~ less_equal(divide(divide(X_49,Y_51),Z_50),divide(divide(X_49,Z_50),divide(Y_51,Z_50))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_162,c_12]) ).

tff(c_930,plain,
    ! [Z_50] :
      ( ( divide(divide(a,Z_50),divide(b,Z_50)) = divide(divide(a,b),Z_50) )
      | ~ less_equal(divide(zero,Z_50),divide(divide(a,Z_50),divide(b,Z_50))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_42,c_854]) ).

tff(c_1155,plain,
    ! [Z_54] : ( divide(divide(a,Z_54),divide(b,Z_54)) = zero ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_41,c_41,c_42,c_930]) ).

tff(c_1238,plain,
    divide(divide(a,c),zero) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_44,c_1155]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_3,Y_4] :
      ( less_equal(X_3,Y_4)
      | ( divide(X_3,Y_4) != zero ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_53]) ).

tff(c_143,plain,
    ! [Y_26,X_27] :
      ( ( Y_26 = X_27 )
      | ~ less_equal(Y_26,X_27)
      | ~ less_equal(X_27,Y_26) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_239,plain,
    ! [X_31] :
      ( ( zero = X_31 )
      | ~ less_equal(X_31,zero) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_143]) ).

tff(c_252,plain,
    ! [X_3] :
      ( ( zero = X_3 )
      | ( divide(X_3,zero) != zero ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_239]) ).

tff(c_1294,plain,
    divide(a,c) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1238,c_252]) ).

tff(c_1330,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_1294]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : HEN005-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:03:56 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.54/1.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/1.95  
% 3.94/1.95  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.94/1.98  
% 3.94/1.98  Inference rules
% 3.94/1.98  ----------------------
% 3.94/1.98  #Ref     : 0
% 3.94/1.98  #Sup     : 315
% 3.94/1.98  #Fact    : 0
% 3.94/1.98  #Define  : 0
% 3.94/1.98  #Split   : 2
% 3.94/1.98  #Chain   : 0
% 3.94/1.98  #Close   : 0
% 3.94/1.98  
% 3.94/1.98  Ordering : KBO
% 3.94/1.98  
% 3.94/1.98  Simplification rules
% 3.94/1.98  ----------------------
% 3.94/1.98  #Subsume      : 22
% 3.94/1.98  #Demod        : 375
% 3.94/1.98  #Tautology    : 179
% 3.94/1.98  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.94/1.98  #BackRed      : 3
% 3.94/1.98  
% 3.94/1.98  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.94/1.98  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.94/1.98  
% 3.94/1.98  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.94/1.98  ----------------------
% 3.94/1.98  Preprocessing        : 0.41
% 3.94/1.98  Parsing              : 0.23
% 3.94/1.98  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.94/1.98  Main loop            : 0.52
% 3.94/1.98  Inferencing          : 0.20
% 3.94/1.98  Reduction            : 0.18
% 3.94/1.98  Demodulation         : 0.14
% 3.94/1.98  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.94/1.98  Subsumption          : 0.09
% 3.94/1.98  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.94/1.98  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.94/1.98  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.94/1.98  Total                : 0.98
% 3.94/1.98  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.94/1.98  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.94/1.98  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.94/1.98  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------