TSTP Solution File: HEN003-5 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : HEN003-5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:50:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.37s 300.10s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(divide_and_equal,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| divide(X1,X2) != zero
| divide(X2,X1) != zero ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oGrVunISgU/E---3.1_19306.p',divide_and_equal) ).
cnf(quotient_smaller_than_numerator,axiom,
divide(divide(X1,X2),X1) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oGrVunISgU/E---3.1_19306.p',quotient_smaller_than_numerator) ).
cnf(quotient_property,axiom,
divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)),divide(divide(X1,X3),X2)) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oGrVunISgU/E---3.1_19306.p',quotient_property) ).
cnf(prove_x_divide_x_is_zero,negated_conjecture,
divide(a,a) != zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oGrVunISgU/E---3.1_19306.p',prove_x_divide_x_is_zero) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| divide(X1,X2) != zero
| divide(X2,X1) != zero ),
divide_and_equal ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
divide(divide(X1,X2),X1) = zero,
quotient_smaller_than_numerator ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)),divide(divide(X1,X3),X2)) = zero,
quotient_property ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( divide(X1,X2) = X1
| divide(X1,divide(X1,X2)) != zero ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),divide(X2,X1)),zero) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X1),divide(X2,X1)) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
divide(a,a) != zero,
prove_x_divide_x_is_zero ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
divide(X1,X1) = zero,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.13 % Problem : HEN003-5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:14:05 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oGrVunISgU/E---3.1_19306.p
% 0.37/300.10 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.37/300.10 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/300.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # new_bool_3 with pid 19467 completed with status 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.37/300.10 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/300.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/300.10 # Search class: FHUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/300.10 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 178s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 19473 completed with status 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Result found by H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.37/300.10 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/300.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/300.10 # Search class: FHUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/300.10 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/300.10 # Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 178s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.10 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.37/300.10 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/300.10
% 0.37/300.10 # Proof found!
% 0.37/300.10 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/300.10 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/300.10 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.37/300.10 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.37/300.10 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.37/300.10 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.37/300.10 # Processed clauses : 17
% 0.37/300.10 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.37/300.10 # ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.37/300.10 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.37/300.10 # Generated clauses : 57
% 0.37/300.10 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.37/300.10 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Paramodulations : 57
% 0.37/300.10 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Total rewrite steps : 48
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.10 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.10 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.10 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.10 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.10 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.37/300.10 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.37/300.10 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.37/300.10 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.37/300.10 # ...number of literals in the above : 27
% 0.37/300.10 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.37/300.10 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.37/300.10 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.37/300.10 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.37/300.10 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # BW rewrite match attempts : 15
% 0.37/300.10 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.37/300.10 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/300.10 # Termbank termtop insertions : 626
% 0.37/300.10
% 0.37/300.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/300.10 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.37/300.10 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.37/300.10 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.37/300.10 # Maximum resident set size: 1628 pages
% 0.37/300.10
% 0.37/300.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/300.10 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.37/300.10 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.37/300.10 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.37/300.10 # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.37/300.10 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.37/300.10 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------