TSTP Solution File: HEN003-2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : HEN003-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:50:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 59 ( 4 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 69 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(divisor_existence,axiom,
( less_equal(X3,X1)
| ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p',divisor_existence) ).
cnf(closure,axiom,
quotient(X1,X2,divide(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p',closure) ).
cnf(quotient_property,axiom,
( less_equal(X7,X8)
| ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ quotient(X2,X4,X5)
| ~ quotient(X1,X4,X6)
| ~ quotient(X6,X5,X7)
| ~ quotient(X3,X4,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p',quotient_property) ).
cnf(quotient_less_equal,axiom,
( quotient(X1,X2,zero)
| ~ less_equal(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p',quotient_less_equal) ).
cnf(less_equal_and_equal,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ less_equal(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p',less_equal_and_equal) ).
cnf(zero_is_smallest,axiom,
less_equal(zero,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p',zero_is_smallest) ).
cnf(less_equal_quotient,axiom,
( less_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ quotient(X1,X2,zero) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p',less_equal_quotient) ).
cnf(prove_x_divide_x_is_zero,negated_conjecture,
~ quotient(x,x,zero),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p',prove_x_divide_x_is_zero) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( less_equal(X3,X1)
| ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3) ),
divisor_existence ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
quotient(X1,X2,divide(X1,X2)),
closure ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( less_equal(X7,X8)
| ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ quotient(X2,X4,X5)
| ~ quotient(X1,X4,X6)
| ~ quotient(X6,X5,X7)
| ~ quotient(X3,X4,X8) ),
quotient_property ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( quotient(X1,X2,zero)
| ~ less_equal(X1,X2) ),
quotient_less_equal ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
less_equal(divide(X1,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( less_equal(divide(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ quotient(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ quotient(X6,X5,X2)
| ~ quotient(X7,X5,X1)
| ~ quotient(X7,X6,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
quotient(divide(X1,X2),X1,zero),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( less_equal(divide(X1,X2),zero)
| ~ quotient(X3,X4,divide(X5,X6))
| ~ quotient(X4,X5,X2)
| ~ quotient(X3,X5,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( less_equal(divide(X1,X2),zero)
| ~ quotient(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ quotient(X4,X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( less_equal(divide(X1,zero),zero)
| ~ quotient(X2,X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ less_equal(X2,X1) ),
less_equal_and_equal ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
less_equal(divide(divide(X1,X1),zero),zero),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
less_equal(zero,X1),
zero_is_smallest ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X1),zero) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
( less_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ quotient(X1,X2,zero) ),
less_equal_quotient ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
quotient(divide(X1,X1),zero,zero),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
less_equal(divide(X1,X1),zero),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
divide(X1,X1) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_24]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ quotient(x,x,zero),
prove_x_divide_x_is_zero ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
quotient(X1,X1,zero),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : HEN003-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:19:59 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NVDwvDtUkL/E---3.1_11264.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 11368 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 11373 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 12
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 73
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 16
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 200
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 81
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 200
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 165
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 79
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 225
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 171
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 58
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2155
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------