TSTP Solution File: HEN002-5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : HEN002-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 21:33:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 5 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_zero_divide_anything_is_zero,negated_conjecture,
divide(zero,a) != zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_zero_divide_anything_is_zero) ).
cnf(zero_is_smallest,axiom,
divide(zero,X1) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN003-0.ax',zero_is_smallest) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
divide(zero,a) != zero,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_zero_divide_anything_is_zero]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
divide(zero,a) != zero,
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
divide(zero,X1) = zero,
zero_is_smallest ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.15 % Problem : HEN002-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.14/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.39 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % DateTime : Sun May 19 22:51:23 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.56 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.41/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 24753 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.41/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.41/0.56 # Search class: FHUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.56 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting U----_210g_05_C07_19_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting U----_210g_05_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # U----_210g_05_C07_19_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 24757 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Result found by U----_210g_05_C07_19_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.41/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.41/0.56 # Search class: FHUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.56 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.41/0.56 # Starting U----_210g_05_C07_19_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.41/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.41/0.56
% 0.41/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.41/0.56 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.41/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.41/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.41/0.56 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.41/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.41/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.41/0.56 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.41/0.56 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.41/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 6
% 0.41/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.41/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.41/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.41/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 79
% 0.41/0.56 # Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.41/0.56
% 0.41/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.56 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.41/0.56 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.41/0.56 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.41/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1584 pages
% 0.41/0.56
% 0.41/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.56 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.41/0.56 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.41/0.56 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.41/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.41/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.41/0.57 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------