TSTP Solution File: HEN002-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : HEN002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:57:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.71s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 1.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ less_e_qual(A,B)
    | quotient(A,B,zero) ),
    file('HEN002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ quotient(zero,x,zero),
    file('HEN002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    less_e_qual(zero,A),
    file('HEN002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    quotient(zero,A,zero),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,1')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[12,7]),
    [iquote('binary,12.1,7.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : HEN002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 08:43:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.71/1.92  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.71/1.92  The process was started by sandbox2 on n007.cluster.edu,
% 1.71/1.92  Wed Jul 27 08:43:16 2022
% 1.71/1.92  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 7409.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.71/1.92  set(auto).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.71/1.92  clear(print_given).
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  list(usable).
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] A=A.
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] -less_e_qual(X,Y)|quotient(X,Y,zero).
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] -quotient(X,Y,zero)|less_e_qual(X,Y).
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] -quotient(X,Y,Z)|less_e_qual(Z,X).
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] -quotient(X,Y,V1)| -quotient(Y,Z,V2)| -quotient(X,Z,V3)| -quotient(V3,V2,V4)| -quotient(V1,Z,V5)|less_e_qual(V4,V5).
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] less_e_qual(zero,X).
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] -less_e_qual(X,Y)| -less_e_qual(Y,X)|X=Y.
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] less_e_qual(X,identity).
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] quotient(X,Y,divide(X,Y)).
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] -quotient(X,Y,Z)| -quotient(X,Y,W)|Z=W.
% 1.71/1.92  0 [] -quotient(zero,x,zero).
% 1.71/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.71/1.92  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.71/1.92  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.71/1.92     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  ------------> process usable:
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 1 [] -less_e_qual(A,B)|quotient(A,B,zero).
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 2 [] -quotient(A,B,zero)|less_e_qual(A,B).
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 3 [] -quotient(A,B,C)|less_e_qual(C,A).
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=23): 4 [] -quotient(A,B,C)| -quotient(B,D,E)| -quotient(A,D,F)| -quotient(F,E,G)| -quotient(C,D,H)|less_e_qual(G,H).
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 5 [] -less_e_qual(A,B)| -less_e_qual(B,A)|A=B.
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 6 [] -quotient(A,B,C)| -quotient(A,B,D)|C=D.
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 7 [] -quotient(zero,x,zero).
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  ------------> process sos:
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 8 [] A=A.
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 9 [] less_e_qual(zero,A).
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 10 [] less_e_qual(A,identity).
% 1.71/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 11 [] quotient(A,B,divide(A,B)).
% 1.71/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [copy,8,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 13 [binary,12.1,7.1] $F.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.71/1.92  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.71/1.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.71/1.92  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  ============ end of search ============
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.71/1.92  clauses given                  2
% 1.71/1.92  clauses generated              3
% 1.71/1.92  clauses kept                  12
% 1.71/1.92  clauses forward subsumed       3
% 1.71/1.92  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.71/1.92  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.71/1.92  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.71/1.92  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.71/1.92  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.71/1.92  
% 1.71/1.92  Process 7409 finished Wed Jul 27 08:43:17 2022
% 1.71/1.92  Otter interrupted
% 1.71/1.92  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------