TSTP Solution File: HAL002+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : HAL002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 12:45:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : HAL002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 21:32:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 34 Number of unprocessed: 33
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37  # 33 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 1 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.37  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37  # 32 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # 1 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.12/0.37  # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.37  # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, hypothesis, (morphism(x,any1,any2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (injection_2(x)|injection(x))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (~injection_2(x)|~injection(x))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (injection_2(X1)|esk9_3(X1,X2,X3)!=zero(X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (subtract(X1,X2,X2)=zero(X1)|~element(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (apply(X1,zero(X2))=zero(X3)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (injection_2(X1)|element(esk9_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (injection(X1)|esk2_2(X1,X2)!=esk1_2(X1,X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (surjection(X1)|apply(X1,X2)!=esk4_3(X1,X3,X4)|~element(X2,X3)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (element(subtract(X1,X2,X3),X1)|~element(X3,X1)|~element(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (injection(X1)|element(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (surjection(X1)|element(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (injection(X1)|element(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (element(apply(X1,X2),X3)|~element(X2,X4)|~morphism(X1,X4,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (apply(X1,esk9_3(X1,X2,X3))=zero(X3)|injection_2(X1)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (subtract(X1,X2,subtract(X1,X2,X3))=X3|~element(X3,X1)|~element(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=zero(X2)|apply(X3,X1)!=zero(X4)|~injection_2(X3)|~element(X1,X2)|~morphism(X3,X2,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (apply(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2))=apply(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))|injection(X1)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (element(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)|~surjection(X1)|~element(X4,X3)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|apply(X3,X1)!=apply(X3,X2)|~injection(X3)|~element(X2,X4)|~element(X1,X4)|~morphism(X3,X4,X5))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (apply(X1,esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))=X4|~surjection(X1)|~element(X4,X3)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (apply(X1,apply(X2,X3))=zero(X4)|~exact(X2,X1)|~element(X3,X5)|~morphism(X2,X5,X6)|~morphism(X1,X6,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (element(esk5_6(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6),X3)|apply(X2,X6)!=zero(X5)|~exact(X1,X2)|~element(X6,X4)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (apply(X1,esk5_6(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6))=X6|apply(X2,X6)!=zero(X5)|~exact(X1,X2)|~element(X6,X4)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (apply(X1,subtract(X2,X3,X4))=subtract(X5,apply(X1,X3),apply(X1,X4))|~element(X4,X2)|~element(X3,X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X5))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (exact(X1,X2)|element(esk7_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X3)|element(esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (commute(X1,X2,X3,X4)|element(esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5)|~morphism(X4,X6,X7)|~morphism(X3,X5,X6)|~morphism(X2,X8,X7)|~morphism(X1,X5,X8))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (exact(X1,X2)|apply(X2,esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))!=zero(X5)|apply(X1,X6)!=esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|~element(esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4)|~element(X6,X3)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (commute(X1,X2,X3,X4)|apply(X2,apply(X1,esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)))!=apply(X4,apply(X3,esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)))|~morphism(X4,X6,X7)|~morphism(X3,X5,X6)|~morphism(X1,X5,X8)|~morphism(X2,X8,X7))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (apply(X1,esk6_5(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5))=zero(X5)|exact(X2,X1)|element(esk7_5(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5),X3)|~morphism(X1,X4,X5)|~morphism(X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (apply(X1,esk7_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))=esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|exact(X1,X2)|element(esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (apply(X1,apply(X2,X3))=apply(X4,apply(X5,X3))|~commute(X2,X1,X5,X4)|~element(X3,X6)|~morphism(X4,X7,X8)|~morphism(X5,X6,X7)|~morphism(X1,X9,X8)|~morphism(X2,X6,X9))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (apply(X1,esk7_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))=esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|apply(X2,esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))=zero(X5)|exact(X1,X2)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X# SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, hypothesis, (morphism(x,any1,any2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (injection_2(x)|injection(x))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (~injection_2(x)|~injection(x))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (injection_2(X1)|esk9_3(X1,X2,X3)!=zero(X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (subtract(X1,X2,X2)=zero(X1)|~element(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (apply(X1,zero(X2))=zero(X3)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (injection_2(X1)|element(esk9_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (injection(X1)|esk2_2(X1,X2)!=esk1_2(X1,X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (surjection(X1)|apply(X1,X2)!=esk4_3(X1,X3,X4)|~element(X2,X3)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (element(subtract(X1,X2,X3),X1)|~element(X3,X1)|~element(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (injection(X1)|element(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (surjection(X1)|element(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (injection(X1)|element(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (element(apply(X1,X2),X3)|~element(X2,X4)|~morphism(X1,X4,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (apply(X1,esk9_3(X1,X2,X3))=zero(X3)|injection_2(X1)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (subtract(X1,X2,subtract(X1,X2,X3))=X3|~element(X3,X1)|~element(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=zero(X2)|apply(X3,X1)!=zero(X4)|~injection_2(X3)|~element(X1,X2)|~morphism(X3,X2,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (apply(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2))=apply(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))|injection(X1)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (element(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)|~surjection(X1)|~element(X4,X3)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|apply(X3,X1)!=apply(X3,X2)|~injection(X3)|~element(X2,X4)|~element(X1,X4)|~morphism(X3,X4,X5))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (apply(X1,esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))=X4|~surjection(X1)|~element(X4,X3)|~morphism(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (apply(X1,apply(X2,X3))=zero(X4)|~exact(X2,X1)|~element(X3,X5)|~morphism(X2,X5,X6)|~morphism(X1,X6,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (element(esk5_6(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6),X3)|apply(X2,X6)!=zero(X5)|~exact(X1,X2)|~element(X6,X4)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (apply(X1,esk5_6(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6))=X6|apply(X2,X6)!=zero(X5)|~exact(X1,X2)|~element(X6,X4)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (apply(X1,subtract(X2,X3,X4))=subtract(X5,apply(X1,X3),apply(X1,X4))|~element(X4,X2)|~element(X3,X2)|~morphism(X1,X2,X5))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (exact(X1,X2)|element(esk7_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X3)|element(esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (commute(X1,X2,X3,X4)|element(esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5)|~morphism(X4,X6,X7)|~morphism(X3,X5,X6)|~morphism(X2,X8,X7)|~morphism(X1,X5,X8))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (exact(X1,X2)|apply(X2,esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))!=zero(X5)|apply(X1,X6)!=esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|~element(esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4)|~element(X6,X3)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (commute(X1,X2,X3,X4)|apply(X2,apply(X1,esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)))!=apply(X4,apply(X3,esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)))|~morphism(X4,X6,X7)|~morphism(X3,X5,X6)|~morphism(X1,X5,X8)|~morphism(X2,X8,X7))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (apply(X1,esk6_5(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5))=zero(X5)|exact(X2,X1)|element(esk7_5(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5),X3)|~morphism(X1,X4,X5)|~morphism(X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (apply(X1,esk7_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))=esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|exact(X1,X2)|element(esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (apply(X1,apply(X2,X3))=apply(X4,apply(X5,X3))|~commute(X2,X1,X5,X4)|~element(X3,X6)|~morphism(X4,X7,X8)|~morphism(X5,X6,X7)|~morphism(X1,X9,X8)|~morphism(X2,X6,X9))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (apply(X1,esk7_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))=esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|apply(X2,esk6_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))=zero(X5)|exact(X1,X2)|~morphism(X2,X4,X5)|~morphism(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (~injection_2(x)|~injection(x)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~injection(x)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_200, plain, (~morphism(x,any1,any2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_32])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_199, plain, (element(esk2_2(x,any1),any1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~injection_2(x)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_37, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_437, plain, (subtract(any1,esk2_2(x,any1),esk2_2(x,any1))=zero(any1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_437, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.38  3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (~injection_2(x)|~injection(x)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~injection(x)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_194, plain, (~morphism(x,any1,any2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_32])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_193, plain, (element(esk1_2(x,any1),any1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~injection_2(x)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_37, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_437, plain, (subtract(any1,esk1_2(x,any1),esk1_2(x,any1))=zero(any1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_437, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.38  # Child (864) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------