TSTP Solution File: GRP816+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GRP816+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:44:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.91s 1.10s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GRP816+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 07:03:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36 Tue Jun 14 07:03:50 2022
% 0.19/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3347.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.19/0.36 strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [copy,66,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i2(C,r(D,E,i2(F,G))))=r(D,E,i2(F,r(A,B,i2(C,G)))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 83 during input processing: 0 [copy,83,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [copy,84,flip.1] {-} i2(A,b(B,m(i2(C,i1(D,E)),B)))=i2(C,i1(D,i2(A,b(B,m(E,B))))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [copy,85,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i2(C,l(D,E,b(F,m(G,F)))))=l(D,E,b(F,m(l(A,B,i2(C,G)),F))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 68 during input processing: 0 [copy,86,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,r(C,D,i2(E,b(F,m(i2(G,H),F)))))=r(C,D,i2(E,r(A,B,b(F,m(i2(G,H),F))))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 69 during input processing: 0 [copy,87,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,j2(C,j2(D,l(E,F,i1(G,H)))))=l(E,F,i1(G,l(A,B,j2(C,j2(D,H))))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 71 during input processing: 0 [copy,88,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,r(E,F,j2(G,H))),C)))=r(E,F,j2(G,l(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,H),C))))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 73 during input processing: 0 [copy,89,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i2(C,j2(D,l(E,F,b(G,m(H,G))))))=l(E,F,b(G,m(r(A,B,i2(C,j2(D,H))),G))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [copy,90,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,l(E,F,j2(G,H)))))=l(E,F,j2(G,l(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,H))))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 76 during input processing: 0 [copy,91,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i2(C,b(D,m(l(E,F,i2(G,H)),D))))=l(E,F,i2(G,l(A,B,i2(C,b(D,m(H,D)))))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 78 during input processing: 0 [copy,92,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,b(C,m(i1(D,r(E,F,b(G,m(H,G)))),C)))=r(E,F,b(G,m(r(A,B,b(C,m(i1(D,H),C))),G))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 80 during input processing: 0 [copy,93,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i1(C,i2(D,r(E,F,b(G,m(H,G))))))=r(E,F,b(G,m(r(A,B,i1(C,i2(D,H))),G))).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 82 during input processing: 0 [copy,94,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i2(C,b(D,m(l(E,F,b(G,m(H,G))),D))))=l(E,F,b(G,m(r(A,B,i2(C,b(D,m(H,D)))),G))).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 71
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 1
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 61
% 0.19/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 0.19/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 18
% 0.19/0.39 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.19/0.39 distinct function count: 11
% 0.19/0.39 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Changing weight limit from 60 to 63.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Model 5 [ 5 1 4294 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Resetting weight limit to 63 after 5 givens.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 6 [ 5 1 726 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 7 [ 2 0 1159 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 8 [ 8 0 2204 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 9 [ 9 0 642 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 10 [ 19 1 2297 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 11 [ 15 0 3631 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 12 [ 10 0 516 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 13 [ 17 0 2008 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10 m(b(A,B),b(b(A,e),e))=i2(A,B).
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.91/1.10 23 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 734.5 K.
% 0.91/1.10 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.91/1.10 sym_ent ( 304) 139 0 139 0 41.3 K
% 0.91/1.10 term ( 32) 11462 10023 1439 32 46.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 rel ( 40) 10378 7938 2440 28 96.4 K
% 0.91/1.10 term_ptr ( 16) 14412 1743 12669 0 198.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 fpa_head ( 24) 3675 418 3257 0 76.3 K
% 0.91/1.10 fpa_tree ( 56) 305 305 0 15 0.8 K
% 0.91/1.10 context (1288) 654 654 0 4 5.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 trail ( 24) 897 897 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.91/1.10 imd_tree ( 32) 301 53 248 9 8.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 imd_pos (4024) 1413 1413 0 7 27.5 K
% 0.91/1.10 is_tree ( 24) 1968 548 1420 0 33.3 K
% 0.91/1.10 is_pos (2424) 605 605 0 20 47.3 K
% 0.91/1.10 fsub_pos ( 16) 78 78 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 literal ( 32) 241 78 163 0 5.1 K
% 0.91/1.10 clause ( 88) 241 78 163 0 14.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 list ( 272) 47 40 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.91/1.10 clash_nd ( 80) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 clause_ptr ( 16) 259 109 150 4 2.4 K
% 0.91/1.10 int_ptr ( 16) 1308 735 573 0 9.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.10 formula( 40) 216 216 0 211 8.2 K
% 0.91/1.10 formula_ptr( 16) 37 37 0 37 0.6 K
% 0.91/1.10 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.91/1.10 _into time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 para_from time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 pre_process time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 renumber time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 demod time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 order equalities 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 unit deleletion 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 factor simplify 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 weigh cl time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 hints keep time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 sort lits time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 forward subsume 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 hints time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 conflict time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 new demod time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 post_process time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 back demod time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 back subsume 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 factor time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10 unindex time 0.00
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 true clauses given 2 (13.3%)
% 0.91/1.10 false clauses given 13
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 FALSE TRUE
% 0.91/1.10 11 1 0
% 0.91/1.10 13 2 0
% 0.91/1.10 14 2 0
% 0.91/1.10 19 2 0
% 0.91/1.10 21 2 0
% 0.91/1.10 23 6 0
% 0.91/1.10 25 1 0
% 0.91/1.10 27 6 0
% 0.91/1.10 31 10 0
% 0.91/1.10 35 4 0
% 0.91/1.10 43 1 0
% 0.91/1.10 63 1 0
% 0.91/1.10 tot: 38 0 (0.0% true)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Model 13 [ 17 0 2008 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.91/1.10 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.91/1.10 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.91/1.10 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.91/1.10 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.91/1.10 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:1 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.91/1.10 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 0.91/1.10 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:1 66:1 67:0 68:1 69:1 70:0
% 0.91/1.10 71:1 72:0 73:1 74:1 75:0 76:1 77:0 78:1 79:0 80:1
% 0.91/1.10 81:0 82:1 83:66 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.91/1.10 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.91/1.10 All others: 0.
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------