TSTP Solution File: GRP810+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GRP810+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:44:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.97s 1.16s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : GRP810+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 00:44:24 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.38 The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.38 Tue Jun 14 00:44:24 2022
% 0.21/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26239.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.21/0.38 strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [copy,72,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [copy,73,flip.1] {-} i2(A,i2(B,i2(C,D)))=i2(B,i2(C,i2(A,D))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 53 during input processing: 0 [copy,74,flip.1] {-} j2(A,b(B,m(b(C,m(b(D,m(E,D)),C)),B)))=b(C,m(b(D,m(j2(A,b(B,m(E,B))),D)),C)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 55 during input processing: 0 [copy,75,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,b(C,m(i1(D,i2(E,F)),C)))=i1(D,i2(E,l(A,B,b(C,m(F,C))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 57 during input processing: 0 [copy,76,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,i1(E,F)),C)))=i2(D,i1(E,l(A,B,b(C,m(F,C))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 58 during input processing: 0 [copy,77,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i1(C,l(D,E,i2(F,G))))=l(D,E,i2(F,l(A,B,i1(C,G)))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 59 during input processing: 0 [copy,78,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i2(C,r(D,E,i2(F,G))))=r(D,E,i2(F,l(A,B,i2(C,G)))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [copy,79,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,b(C,m(i1(D,l(E,F,i2(G,H))),C)))=l(E,F,i2(G,l(A,B,b(C,m(i1(D,H),C))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 62 during input processing: 0 [copy,80,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i2(C,i1(D,l(E,F,j2(G,H)))))=l(E,F,j2(G,r(A,B,i2(C,i1(D,H))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [copy,81,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,r(E,F,b(G,m(H,G))))))=r(E,F,b(G,m(l(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,H))),G))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [copy,82,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,r(E,F,i1(G,H)))))=r(E,F,i1(G,r(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,H))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [copy,83,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,j2(C,j2(D,l(E,F,i1(G,H)))))=l(E,F,i1(G,r(A,B,j2(C,j2(D,H))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [copy,84,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,r(E,F,i2(G,H)))))=r(E,F,i2(G,l(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,H))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 69 during input processing: 0 [copy,85,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,l(E,F,i2(G,H))),C)))=l(E,F,i2(G,l(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,H),C))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 70 during input processing: 0 [copy,86,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,l(E,F,i1(G,H)))))=l(E,F,i1(G,l(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,H))))).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 71 during input processing: 0 [copy,87,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,r(E,F,i2(G,H)))))=r(E,F,i2(G,r(A,B,i2(C,i2(D,H))))).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.21/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 70
% 0.21/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 1
% 0.21/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 61
% 0.21/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 0.21/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 18
% 0.21/0.43 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.21/0.43 distinct function count: 11
% 0.21/0.43 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 5 [ 5 1 4294 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 6 [ 5 1 726 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 7 [ 2 1 1159 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 8 [ 8 1 2204 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 9 [ 9 0 642 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 10 [ 19 1 2297 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 11 [ 15 1 3631 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 12 [ 10 0 516 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 13 [ 17 1 2008 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16 m(b(A,B),b(b(A,e),e))=i2(A,B).
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.97/1.16 19 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 606.7 K.
% 0.97/1.16 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.97/1.16 sym_ent ( 304) 139 0 139 0 41.3 K
% 0.97/1.16 term ( 32) 10602 9243 1359 44 43.8 K
% 0.97/1.16 rel ( 40) 9607 7487 2120 37 84.3 K
% 0.97/1.16 term_ptr ( 16) 11386 1998 9388 0 146.7 K
% 0.97/1.16 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 fpa_head ( 24) 3087 427 2660 0 62.3 K
% 0.97/1.16 fpa_tree ( 56) 312 312 0 15 0.8 K
% 0.97/1.16 context (1288) 666 666 0 4 5.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 trail ( 24) 802 802 0 5 0.1 K
% 0.97/1.16 imd_tree ( 32) 246 78 168 5 5.4 K
% 0.97/1.16 imd_pos (4024) 1857 1857 0 3 11.8 K
% 0.97/1.16 is_tree ( 24) 1672 610 1062 0 24.9 K
% 0.97/1.16 is_pos (2424) 633 633 0 18 42.6 K
% 0.97/1.16 fsub_pos ( 16) 81 81 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 literal ( 32) 249 92 157 0 4.9 K
% 0.97/1.16 clause ( 88) 249 92 157 0 13.5 K
% 0.97/1.16 list ( 272) 46 39 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.97/1.16 clash_nd ( 80) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 clause_ptr ( 16) 247 108 139 15 2.4 K
% 0.97/1.16 int_ptr ( 16) 1363 846 517 2 8.1 K
% 0.97/1.16 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 formula( 40) 211 211 0 206 8.0 K
% 0.97/1.16 formula_ptr( 16) 36 36 0 36 0.6 K
% 0.97/1.16 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.97/1.16 sec)
% 0.97/1.16 system CPU time 0.03 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 0.97/1.16 wall-clock time 1 (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 0.97/1.16 input time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 clausify time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 process input 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 pick given time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 para_into time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 para_from time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 pre_process time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 renumber time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 demod time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 order equalities 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 unit deleletion 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 factor simplify 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 weigh cl time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 hints keep time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 sort lits time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 forward subsume 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 hints time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 conflict time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 new demod time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 post_process time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 back demod time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 back subsume 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 factor time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16 unindex time 0.00
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 true clauses given 2 (13.3%)
% 0.97/1.16 false clauses given 13
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 FALSE TRUE
% 0.97/1.16 11 1 0
% 0.97/1.16 13 2 0
% 0.97/1.16 14 2 0
% 0.97/1.16 15 2 0
% 0.97/1.16 19 2 0
% 0.97/1.16 23 6 0
% 0.97/1.16 25 5 0
% 0.97/1.16 27 13 0
% 0.97/1.16 31 8 0
% 0.97/1.16 tot: 41 0 (0.0% true)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Model 13 [ 17 1 2008 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.97/1.16 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.97/1.16 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.97/1.16 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.97/1.16 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:1 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.97/1.16 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.97/1.16 51:0 52:0 53:1 54:0 55:1 56:0 57:1 58:1 59:1 60:0
% 0.97/1.16 61:1 62:1 63:0 64:1 65:1 66:1 67:1 68:0 69:1 70:1
% 0.97/1.16 71:1 72:66 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.97/1.16 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.97/1.16 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.97/1.16 All others: 0.
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.97/1.16
% 0.97/1.16 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------