TSTP Solution File: GRP756-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : GRP756-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:43:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  30 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (  29 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f05,axiom,
    mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X2),X3)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KJaoc4zRPp/E---3.1_24268.p',f05) ).

cnf(f03,axiom,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KJaoc4zRPp/E---3.1_24268.p',f03) ).

cnf(f02,axiom,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KJaoc4zRPp/E---3.1_24268.p',f02) ).

cnf(f04,axiom,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KJaoc4zRPp/E---3.1_24268.p',f04) ).

cnf(f01,axiom,
    mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KJaoc4zRPp/E---3.1_24268.p',f01) ).

cnf(goals,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(a,b),c) != mult(a,mult(b,c)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KJaoc4zRPp/E---3.1_24268.p',goals) ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X2),X3)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X2,X3)),
    f05 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    f03 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    f02 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),mult(mult(X2,X2),X3)) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    f04 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
    f01 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ld(rd(X1,X2),mult(X1,mult(X2,X3))) = mult(mult(X2,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    rd(X1,ld(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X2),ld(X2,X3))) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    mult(mult(ld(X1,X2),ld(X1,X2)),X3) = ld(X1,mult(X2,mult(ld(X1,X2),X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,ld(X2,X3)),X4) = mult(X1,ld(X2,mult(X3,X4))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,ld(X2,mult(X3,X4))),X4) = mult(X1,ld(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ld(mult(X1,X2),mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X2),X3))) = mult(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),mult(mult(X2,X2),X3)) = rd(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,ld(mult(X2,X2),X3))) = mult(rd(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    mult(X1,ld(mult(X2,X3),X2)) = rd(X1,X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    mult(X1,rd(X2,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ld(X1,X1) = rd(X2,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ld(rd(X1,X2),X1) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    rd(X1,X1) = rd(X2,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ld(rd(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(a,b),c) != mult(a,mult(b,c)),
    goals ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),X3) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_26]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.13  % Problem    : GRP756-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:57:43 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KJaoc4zRPp/E---3.1_24268.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 24346 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 24355 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 85
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 21
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 17
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 47
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 18
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 878
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 645
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 878
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 846
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 561
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 561
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 25
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 149
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 24
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8963
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1508 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.049 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.060 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------