TSTP Solution File: GRP748+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GRP748+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 08:40:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.84s 2.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  33 unt;   4 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (  40 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),i(X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(mult(esk4_0,esk6_0),esk5_0),esk6_0) != mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( mult(X1,X2) = mult(X2,X1)
    | mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-34tnat9g/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),i(X2)) = X1,
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(mult(esk4_0,esk6_0),esk5_0),esk6_0) != mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( mult(X1,X2) = mult(X2,X1)
    | mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    mult(i(X1),mult(mult(X1,X2),X1)) = mult(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    i(i(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    mult(X1,i(X2)) = rd(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk4_0,mult(mult(esk6_0,esk5_0),esk6_0)) != mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( mult(mult(X1,X2),X1) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X1))
    | mult(X2,X1) = mult(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),X2) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_38]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk5_0,esk6_0) = mult(esk6_0,esk5_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ld(i(X1),mult(X2,X1)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    mult(mult(esk6_0,esk5_0),esk6_0) = mult(esk5_0,mult(esk6_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk4_0,mult(mult(esk6_0,esk5_0),esk6_0)) != mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk6_0,esk5_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ld(i(X1),X2) = mult(X1,X2)
    | mult(X1,X2) = mult(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ld(i(esk6_0),mult(esk6_0,esk5_0)) = mult(esk5_0,mult(esk6_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_43]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk4_0,mult(esk5_0,mult(esk6_0,esk6_0))) != mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk6_0,esk5_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    mult(esk5_0,mult(esk6_0,esk6_0)) = mult(esk6_0,mult(esk6_0,esk5_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_45])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GRP748+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 21:46:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.84/2.40  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.84/2.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.84/2.40  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.84/2.40  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 7.84/2.40  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.84/2.40  #
% 7.84/2.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.84/2.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.84/2.40  
% 7.84/2.40  # Proof found!
% 7.84/2.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.84/2.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.84/2.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.84/2.40  
% 7.84/2.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.84/2.40  # User time                : 0.056 s
% 7.84/2.40  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 7.84/2.40  # Total time               : 0.064 s
% 7.84/2.40  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.84/2.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------