TSTP Solution File: GRP715-10 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GRP715-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:50:21 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 20 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 19 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f07,axiom,
mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zu0m60pz1P/E---3.1_10170.p',f07) ).
cnf(f06,axiom,
mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zu0m60pz1P/E---3.1_10170.p',f06) ).
cnf(f11,axiom,
mult(op_b,op_a) = unit,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zu0m60pz1P/E---3.1_10170.p',f11) ).
cnf(f09,axiom,
mult(unit,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zu0m60pz1P/E---3.1_10170.p',f09) ).
cnf(f10,axiom,
mult(op_a,op_b) = unit,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zu0m60pz1P/E---3.1_10170.p',f10) ).
cnf(f08,axiom,
mult(X1,unit) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zu0m60pz1P/E---3.1_10170.p',f08) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(x0,op_a),op_b) != x0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zu0m60pz1P/E---3.1_10170.p',goal) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X2),
f07 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
f06 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
mult(mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),X2) = mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),mult(X2,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
mult(op_b,op_a) = unit,
f11 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
mult(unit,X1) = X1,
f09 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
mult(op_a,op_b) = unit,
f10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
mult(mult(mult(X1,op_b),op_a),mult(op_b,op_b)) = mult(X1,mult(op_b,op_b)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mult(op_a,mult(op_b,op_b)) = op_b,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
mult(X1,unit) = X1,
f08 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
mult(mult(X1,mult(op_b,op_b)),op_a) = mult(X1,op_b),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_10]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(x0,op_a),op_b) != x0,
goal ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
mult(mult(X1,op_a),op_b) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_16]),c_0_14]),c_0_10]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP715-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:23:56 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zu0m60pz1P/E---3.1_10170.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_1 with pid 10250 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 10256 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 65
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 60
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 671
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 456
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 671
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 1060
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 45
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 45
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 403
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 403
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 15
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 59
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14643
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------