TSTP Solution File: GRP704-12 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GRP704-12 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:50:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 10 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f01,axiom,
mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GOlnF6NxCy/E---3.1_18919.p',f01) ).
cnf(f10,axiom,
mult(X1,mult(op_c,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,op_c),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GOlnF6NxCy/E---3.1_18919.p',f10) ).
cnf(f13,axiom,
op_f = mult(X1,mult(X2,ld(mult(X1,X2),op_c))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GOlnF6NxCy/E---3.1_18919.p',f13) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
mult(x4,mult(op_f,x5)) != mult(mult(x4,op_f),x5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GOlnF6NxCy/E---3.1_18919.p',goal) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
f01 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
mult(X1,mult(op_c,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,op_c),X2),
f10 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
op_f = mult(X1,mult(X2,ld(mult(X1,X2),op_c))),
f13 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
mult(X1,mult(op_c,ld(mult(X1,op_c),X2))) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mult(x4,mult(op_f,x5)) != mult(mult(x4,op_f),x5),
goal ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
op_f = op_c,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GRP704-12 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:34:39 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GOlnF6NxCy/E---3.1_18919.p
% 0.17/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # new_bool_3 with pid 18997 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 19000 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.17/0.44 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.17/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Generated clauses : 77
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 65
% 0.17/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Paramodulations : 77
% 0.17/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 72
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.17/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 61
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.17/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1316
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.17/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------