TSTP Solution File: GRP704-11 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : GRP704-11 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:19:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP704-11 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 00:55:26 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.39 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.39 Axiom 1 (f05): mult(X, unit) = X.
% 0.19/0.39 Axiom 2 (f06): mult(unit, X) = X.
% 0.19/0.39 Axiom 3 (f01): mult(X, ld(X, Y)) = Y.
% 0.19/0.39 Axiom 4 (f09): mult(X, mult(Y, op_c)) = mult(mult(X, Y), op_c).
% 0.19/0.39 Axiom 5 (f02): ld(X, mult(X, Y)) = Y.
% 0.19/0.39 Axiom 6 (f11): op_d = ld(X, mult(op_c, X)).
% 0.19/0.39 Axiom 7 (f13): op_f = mult(X, mult(Y, ld(mult(X, Y), op_c))).
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.40 Lemma 8: mult(op_c, X) = mult(X, op_c).
% 0.19/0.40 Proof:
% 0.19/0.40 mult(op_c, X)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 3 (f01) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, ld(X, mult(op_c, X)))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 6 (f11) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, op_d)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 6 (f11) }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, ld(op_c, mult(op_c, op_c)))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 5 (f02) }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, op_c)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Lemma 9: mult(op_c, X) = mult(X, op_f).
% 0.19/0.40 Proof:
% 0.19/0.40 mult(op_c, X)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, op_c)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 3 (f01) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, mult(Y, ld(Y, op_c)))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 2 (f06) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, mult(Y, mult(unit, ld(Y, op_c))))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (f05) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, mult(Y, mult(unit, ld(mult(Y, unit), op_c))))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 7 (f13) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(X, op_f)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Goal 1 (goal): mult(x4, mult(x5, op_f)) = mult(mult(x4, x5), op_f).
% 0.19/0.40 Proof:
% 0.19/0.40 mult(x4, mult(x5, op_f))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(x4, mult(op_c, x5))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(x4, mult(x5, op_c))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 4 (f09) }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(mult(x4, x5), op_c)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(op_c, mult(x4, x5))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.19/0.40 mult(mult(x4, x5), op_f)
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------