TSTP Solution File: GRP704-11 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP704-11 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:41:59 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 20.51s 9.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 20.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  30 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   3   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (;  39   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ rd > mult > ld > #nlpp > x5 > x4 > unit > op_f > op_e > op_d > op_c

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(ld,type,
    ld: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(op_f,type,
    op_f: $i ).

tff(rd,type,
    rd: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(op_e,type,
    op_e: $i ).

tff(op_c,type,
    op_c: $i ).

tff(x4,type,
    x4: $i ).

tff(unit,type,
    unit: $i ).

tff(op_d,type,
    op_d: $i ).

tff(x5,type,
    x5: $i ).

tff(mult,type,
    mult: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( ld(A,mult(A,B)) = B ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_25,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( mult(A,ld(A,B)) = B ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_45,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( op_d = ld(A,mult(op_c,A)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_43,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( mult(A,mult(op_c,B)) = mult(mult(A,op_c),B) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_39,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( mult(op_c,mult(A,B)) = mult(mult(op_c,A),B) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_35,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( mult(unit,A) = A ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_49,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( op_f = mult(A,mult(B,ld(mult(A,B),op_c))) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    mult(x4,mult(x5,op_f)) != mult(mult(x4,x5),op_f),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_3,B_4] : ( ld(A_3,mult(A_3,B_4)) = B_4 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2] : ( mult(A_1,ld(A_1,B_2)) = B_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).

tff(c_72,plain,
    ! [A_28,B_29] : ( ld(A_28,mult(A_28,B_29)) = B_29 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [A_20] : ( ld(A_20,mult(op_c,A_20)) = op_d ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_45]) ).

tff(c_79,plain,
    op_d = op_c,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_72,c_22]) ).

tff(c_266,plain,
    ! [A_40] : ( ld(A_40,mult(op_c,A_40)) = op_c ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_79,c_22]) ).

tff(c_271,plain,
    ! [A_40] : ( mult(op_c,A_40) = mult(A_40,op_c) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_266,c_2]) ).

tff(c_330,plain,
    ! [A_43,B_44] : ( mult(mult(A_43,op_c),B_44) = mult(A_43,mult(op_c,B_44)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).

tff(c_362,plain,
    ! [A_43,B_2] : ( mult(A_43,mult(op_c,ld(mult(A_43,op_c),B_2))) = B_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_330]) ).

tff(c_929,plain,
    ! [A_58,B_59] : ( mult(mult(op_c,A_58),B_59) = mult(op_c,mult(A_58,B_59)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_5580,plain,
    ! [B_116,B_117] : ( mult(op_c,mult(ld(op_c,B_116),B_117)) = mult(B_116,B_117) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_929]) ).

tff(c_5674,plain,
    ! [B_116,B_2] : ( mult(B_116,mult(op_c,ld(mult(ld(op_c,B_116),op_c),B_2))) = mult(op_c,B_2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_362,c_5580]) ).

tff(c_27322,plain,
    ! [B_259,B_260] : ( mult(B_259,mult(op_c,ld(B_259,B_260))) = mult(op_c,B_260) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_271,c_5674]) ).

tff(c_27727,plain,
    ! [A_3,B_4] : ( mult(op_c,mult(A_3,B_4)) = mult(A_3,mult(op_c,B_4)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_27322]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [A_10] : ( mult(unit,A_10) = A_10 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_1079,plain,
    ! [A_61,B_62] : ( mult(A_61,mult(B_62,ld(mult(A_61,B_62),op_c))) = op_f ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_1117,plain,
    ! [B_62] : ( mult(B_62,ld(mult(unit,B_62),op_c)) = op_f ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1079,c_12]) ).

tff(c_1182,plain,
    op_f = op_c,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_12,c_1117]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    mult(mult(x4,x5),op_f) != mult(x4,mult(x5,op_f)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_1191,plain,
    mult(mult(x4,x5),op_c) != mult(x4,mult(x5,op_c)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1182,c_1182,c_28]) ).

tff(c_1192,plain,
    mult(x4,mult(op_c,x5)) != mult(op_c,mult(x4,x5)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_271,c_271,c_1191]) ).

tff(c_71008,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_27727,c_1192]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem  : GRP704-11 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:36:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 20.51/9.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 20.51/9.41  
% 20.51/9.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 20.62/9.44  
% 20.62/9.44  Inference rules
% 20.62/9.44  ----------------------
% 20.62/9.44  #Ref     : 0
% 20.62/9.44  #Sup     : 16577
% 20.62/9.44  #Fact    : 0
% 20.62/9.44  #Define  : 0
% 20.62/9.44  #Split   : 0
% 20.62/9.44  #Chain   : 0
% 20.62/9.44  #Close   : 0
% 20.62/9.44  
% 20.62/9.44  Ordering : KBO
% 20.62/9.44  
% 20.62/9.44  Simplification rules
% 20.62/9.44  ----------------------
% 20.62/9.44  #Subsume      : 496
% 20.62/9.44  #Demod        : 26925
% 20.62/9.44  #Tautology    : 8271
% 20.62/9.44  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 20.62/9.44  #BackRed      : 66
% 20.62/9.44  
% 20.62/9.44  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 20.62/9.44  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 20.62/9.44  
% 20.62/9.44  Timing (in seconds)
% 20.62/9.44  ----------------------
% 20.62/9.44  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 20.62/9.44  Parsing              : 0.24
% 20.62/9.44  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 20.62/9.44  Main loop            : 7.92
% 20.62/9.44  Inferencing          : 1.24
% 20.62/9.44  Reduction            : 5.03
% 20.62/9.44  Demodulation         : 4.65
% 20.62/9.44  BG Simplification    : 0.15
% 20.62/9.44  Subsumption          : 1.12
% 20.62/9.44  Abstraction          : 0.29
% 20.62/9.44  MUC search           : 0.00
% 20.62/9.44  Cooper               : 0.00
% 20.62/9.44  Total                : 8.41
% 20.62/9.44  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 20.62/9.44  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 20.62/9.44  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 20.62/9.44  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------