TSTP Solution File: GRP703-10 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GRP703-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:50:18 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.26s 300.15s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 21 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 20 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f02,axiom,
ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p',f02) ).
cnf(f11,axiom,
op_d = ld(X1,mult(op_c,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p',f11) ).
cnf(f01,axiom,
mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p',f01) ).
cnf(f12,axiom,
op_e = mult(mult(rd(op_c,mult(X1,X2)),X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p',f12) ).
cnf(f10,axiom,
mult(X1,mult(op_c,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,op_c),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p',f10) ).
cnf(f03,axiom,
mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p',f03) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
mult(op_e,mult(x2,x3)) != mult(mult(op_e,x2),x3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p',goal) ).
cnf(f08,axiom,
mult(op_c,mult(X1,X2)) = mult(mult(op_c,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p',f08) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
f02 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
op_d = ld(X1,mult(op_c,X1)),
f11 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
op_d = op_c,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
f01 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
ld(X1,mult(op_c,X1)) = op_c,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
op_e = mult(mult(rd(op_c,mult(X1,X2)),X2),X1),
f12 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mult(X1,op_c) = mult(op_c,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
mult(X1,mult(op_c,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,op_c),X2),
f10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
f03 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
mult(op_e,mult(x2,x3)) != mult(mult(op_e,x2),x3),
goal ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
op_e = op_c,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
mult(op_c,mult(X1,X2)) = mult(mult(op_c,X1),X2),
f08 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : GRP703-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:15:14 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xcFclAN9vQ/E---3.1_27916.p
% 0.26/300.15 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.26/300.15 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/300.15 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # sh5l with pid 27996 completed with status 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.26/300.15 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/300.15 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/300.15 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/300.15 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 28003 completed with status 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Result found by G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.26/300.15 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/300.15 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/300.15 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/300.15 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/300.15 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.15 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/300.15 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/300.15
% 0.26/300.15 # Proof found!
% 0.26/300.15 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/300.15 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/300.15 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.26/300.15 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 0.26/300.15 # Initial clauses : 12
% 0.26/300.15 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.26/300.15 # Processed clauses : 29
% 0.26/300.15 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # ...remaining for further processing : 29
% 0.26/300.15 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.26/300.15 # Generated clauses : 104
% 0.26/300.15 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 93
% 0.26/300.15 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Paramodulations : 104
% 0.26/300.15 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # NegExts : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Total rewrite steps : 58
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.15 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.15 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.15 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.15 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.15 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.26/300.15 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.26/300.15 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.26/300.15 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 87
% 0.26/300.15 # ...number of literals in the above : 87
% 0.26/300.15 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.26/300.15 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.26/300.15 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.26/300.15 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.26/300.15 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/300.15 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1317
% 0.26/300.15
% 0.26/300.15 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/300.15 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/300.15 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/300.15 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/300.15 # Maximum resident set size: 1600 pages
% 0.26/300.15
% 0.26/300.15 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/300.15 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/300.15 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/300.15 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.26/300.15 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.26/300.15 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------