TSTP Solution File: GRP702-11 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : GRP702-11 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:42:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   9 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f02,axiom,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qz6dKE15Kg/E---3.1_13630.p',f02) ).

cnf(f11,axiom,
    op_d = ld(X1,mult(op_c,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qz6dKE15Kg/E---3.1_13630.p',f11) ).

cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
    mult(x0,mult(x1,op_d)) != mult(mult(x0,x1),op_d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qz6dKE15Kg/E---3.1_13630.p',goal) ).

cnf(f09,axiom,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,op_c)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),op_c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qz6dKE15Kg/E---3.1_13630.p',f09) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    f02 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    op_d = ld(X1,mult(op_c,X1)),
    f11 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    mult(x0,mult(x1,op_d)) != mult(mult(x0,x1),op_d),
    goal ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    op_d = op_c,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,op_c)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),op_c),
    f09 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : GRP702-11 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:08:59 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qz6dKE15Kg/E---3.1_13630.p
% 0.15/0.41  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # new_bool_1 with pid 13710 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.41  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 13715 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Result found by G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.41  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.15/0.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
% 0.15/0.41  # Initial clauses                      : 8
% 0.15/0.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.15/0.41  # Processed clauses                    : 17
% 0.15/0.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 17
% 0.15/0.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.15/0.41  # Generated clauses                    : 31
% 0.15/0.41  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25
% 0.15/0.41  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Paramodulations                      : 31
% 0.15/0.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Total rewrite steps                  : 30
% 0.15/0.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.15/0.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.15/0.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.15/0.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 24
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.15/0.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.15/0.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.15/0.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 601
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1612 pages
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.15/0.41  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.41  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------