TSTP Solution File: GRP702+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GRP702+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:50:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   7   ~;   4   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn;  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( mult(op_d,mult(X4,X5)) = mult(mult(op_d,X4),X5)
      & mult(X4,mult(X5,op_d)) = mult(mult(X4,X5),op_d)
      & mult(X4,mult(op_d,X5)) = mult(mult(X4,op_d),X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yRtxyKGE82/E---3.1_24509.p',goals) ).

fof(f02,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ld(X2,mult(X2,X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yRtxyKGE82/E---3.1_24509.p',f02) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X2] : op_d = ld(X2,mult(op_c,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yRtxyKGE82/E---3.1_24509.p',f11) ).

fof(f08,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : mult(op_c,mult(X2,X1)) = mult(mult(op_c,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yRtxyKGE82/E---3.1_24509.p',f08) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : mult(X2,mult(op_c,X1)) = mult(mult(X2,op_c),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yRtxyKGE82/E---3.1_24509.p',f10) ).

fof(f09,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : mult(X2,mult(X1,op_c)) = mult(mult(X2,X1),op_c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yRtxyKGE82/E---3.1_24509.p',f09) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( mult(op_d,mult(X4,X5)) = mult(mult(op_d,X4),X5)
        & mult(X4,mult(X5,op_d)) = mult(mult(X4,X5),op_d)
        & mult(X4,mult(op_d,X5)) = mult(mult(X4,op_d),X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] : ld(X9,mult(X9,X8)) = X8,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f02]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X25] : op_d = ld(X25,mult(op_c,X25)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(op_d,mult(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != mult(mult(op_d,esk1_0),esk2_0)
    | mult(esk1_0,mult(esk2_0,op_d)) != mult(mult(esk1_0,esk2_0),op_d)
    | mult(esk1_0,mult(op_d,esk2_0)) != mult(mult(esk1_0,op_d),esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    op_d = ld(X1,mult(op_c,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] : mult(op_c,mult(X20,X19)) = mult(mult(op_c,X20),X19),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f08]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] : mult(X24,mult(op_c,X23)) = mult(mult(X24,op_c),X23),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] : mult(X22,mult(X21,op_c)) = mult(mult(X22,X21),op_c),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f09]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(op_d,mult(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != mult(mult(op_d,esk1_0),esk2_0)
    | mult(esk1_0,mult(esk2_0,op_d)) != mult(mult(esk1_0,esk2_0),op_d)
    | mult(esk1_0,mult(op_d,esk2_0)) != mult(mult(esk1_0,op_d),esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    op_d = op_c,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    mult(op_c,mult(X1,X2)) = mult(mult(op_c,X1),X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(op_c,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,op_c),X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,op_c)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),op_c),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]),c_0_18]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]),c_0_19]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : GRP702+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:24:53 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.44  Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yRtxyKGE82/E---3.1_24509.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 24586 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.45  # Search class: FUHPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 24590 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Result found by H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.18/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.45  # Search class: FUHPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.18/0.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.18/0.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.18/0.45  # Processed clauses                    : 29
% 0.18/0.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 29
% 0.18/0.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.18/0.45  # Generated clauses                    : 101
% 0.18/0.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 87
% 0.18/0.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Paramodulations                      : 101
% 0.18/0.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 74
% 0.18/0.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 13
% 0.18/0.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 0.18/0.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 86
% 0.18/0.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 86
% 0.18/0.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.18/0.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.18/0.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.18/0.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1714
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.45  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.18/0.45  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.18/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------